This thesis examines the gap between Latin American countries' progressive laws on international protection and their restrictive implementation. Despite recognising gender-based violence as persecution, women fleeing such violence are often excluded from refugee protection. Using a decolonial feminist lens, the research examines how gaps in the Inter-American system create vulnerabilities that heighten the risk of trafficking and exploitation for asylum-seeking women. It focuses on the "protection continuum" in reverse—a multidimensional trajectory of violence from persecution, through border exclusion, to exploitation in destination countries. Chile exemplifies this protection paradox: despite adopting the 1951 Convention, the Cartagena Declaration, and the Belém do Pará Convention, it has some of the lowest refugee recognition rates in the region, largely rejecting claims based on gender-based violence. Beyond documenting these structural failures, the thesis explores migrant women’s resistance strategies and the alternative protection mechanisms provided by civil society, which often become the only support. It contends that resisting gender-based violence is a political act, positioning migrant women as active agents of resistance rather than merely victims.

This thesis examines the gap between Latin American countries' progressive laws on international protection and their restrictive implementation. Despite recognising gender-based violence as persecution, women fleeing such violence are often excluded from refugee protection. Using a decolonial feminist lens, the research examines how gaps in the Inter-American system create vulnerabilities that heighten the risk of trafficking and exploitation for asylum-seeking women. It focuses on the "protection continuum" in reverse—a multidimensional trajectory of violence from persecution, through border exclusion, to exploitation in destination countries. Chile exemplifies this protection paradox: despite adopting the 1951 Convention, the Cartagena Declaration, and the Belém do Pará Convention, it has some of the lowest refugee recognition rates in the region, largely rejecting claims based on gender-based violence. Beyond documenting these structural failures, the thesis explores migrant women’s resistance strategies and the alternative protection mechanisms provided by civil society, which often become the only support. It contends that resisting gender-based violence is a political act, positioning migrant women as active agents of resistance rather than merely victims.

The Continuum of Violence in Chile's Protection System: From Gender-Based Persecution to Trafficking Vulnerabilities and Migrant Women's Resistance Strategies

SUIZZO, SOFIA LIA
2025/2026

Abstract

This thesis examines the gap between Latin American countries' progressive laws on international protection and their restrictive implementation. Despite recognising gender-based violence as persecution, women fleeing such violence are often excluded from refugee protection. Using a decolonial feminist lens, the research examines how gaps in the Inter-American system create vulnerabilities that heighten the risk of trafficking and exploitation for asylum-seeking women. It focuses on the "protection continuum" in reverse—a multidimensional trajectory of violence from persecution, through border exclusion, to exploitation in destination countries. Chile exemplifies this protection paradox: despite adopting the 1951 Convention, the Cartagena Declaration, and the Belém do Pará Convention, it has some of the lowest refugee recognition rates in the region, largely rejecting claims based on gender-based violence. Beyond documenting these structural failures, the thesis explores migrant women’s resistance strategies and the alternative protection mechanisms provided by civil society, which often become the only support. It contends that resisting gender-based violence is a political act, positioning migrant women as active agents of resistance rather than merely victims.
2025
The Continuum of Violence in Chile's Protection System: From Gender-Based Persecution to Trafficking Vulnerabilities and Migrant Women's Resistance Strategies
This thesis examines the gap between Latin American countries' progressive laws on international protection and their restrictive implementation. Despite recognising gender-based violence as persecution, women fleeing such violence are often excluded from refugee protection. Using a decolonial feminist lens, the research examines how gaps in the Inter-American system create vulnerabilities that heighten the risk of trafficking and exploitation for asylum-seeking women. It focuses on the "protection continuum" in reverse—a multidimensional trajectory of violence from persecution, through border exclusion, to exploitation in destination countries. Chile exemplifies this protection paradox: despite adopting the 1951 Convention, the Cartagena Declaration, and the Belém do Pará Convention, it has some of the lowest refugee recognition rates in the region, largely rejecting claims based on gender-based violence. Beyond documenting these structural failures, the thesis explores migrant women’s resistance strategies and the alternative protection mechanisms provided by civil society, which often become the only support. It contends that resisting gender-based violence is a political act, positioning migrant women as active agents of resistance rather than merely victims.
Chile
Protection
Trafficking
Women
Resistance
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Thesis Sofia Lia Suizzo.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 1.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.47 MB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/104643