This thesis examines the contradictions of the Green Transition through the lens of climate justice, using the Jadar project in Serbia as case-study that demonstrates extensively how the imperative to deliver Sustainable Development Goals in the shortest possible time can, if mismanaged, lead to violations of environmental rights both substantively and procedurally. The case is peculiarly illustrative not only for analysing in practice how principles of environmental democracy are applied- or sidelined- in decision-making processes, but also for exploring how a constellation of cross-cutting issues interacts in such contexts – ranging from democratic and rule of law backsliding to the silencing of environmental activism. At the same time, the Jadar project offers a unique vantage point from which to examine the broader geopolitical and regulatory dynamics surrounding Critical Raw Materials. As the European Union seeks to secure strategic autonomy in the supply of materials deemed essential for the transition towards a sustainable, low-carbon future, projects like Jadar acquire pivotal relevance. The case-study therefore sheds light on how evolving sustainability objectives- if narrowly framed or pursued through technocratic urgency- can inadvertently reproduce extractive and exploitative logics that externalize harm into sacrifice-zones. It highlights how participatory governance functions as the hinge between legitimacy and injustice, degerming whether strategic projects contribute to a just transition or instead perpetuate the very inequalities and environmental burdens they purport to resolve.

This thesis examines the contradictions of the Green Transition through the lens of climate justice, using the Jadar project in Serbia as case-study that demonstrates extensively how the imperative to deliver Sustainable Development Goals in the shortest possible time can, if mismanaged, lead to violations of environmental rights both substantively and procedurally. The case is peculiarly illustrative not only for analysing in practice how principles of environmental democracy are applied- or sidelined- in decision-making processes, but also for exploring how a constellation of cross-cutting issues interacts in such contexts – ranging from democratic and rule of law backsliding to the silencing of environmental activism. At the same time, the Jadar project offers a unique vantage point from which to examine the broader geopolitical and regulatory dynamics surrounding Critical Raw Materials. As the European Union seeks to secure strategic autonomy in the supply of materials deemed essential for the transition towards a sustainable, low-carbon future, projects like Jadar acquire pivotal relevance. The case-study therefore sheds light on how evolving sustainability objectives- if narrowly framed or pursued through technocratic urgency- can inadvertently reproduce extractive and exploitative logics that externalize harm into sacrifice-zones. It highlights how participatory governance functions as the hinge between legitimacy and injustice, degerming whether strategic projects contribute to a just transition or instead perpetuate the very inequalities and environmental burdens they purport to resolve.

Participatory Governance and Environmental Rights: A Climate Justice Assessment of the Jadar Project

RACASI, MATILDE
2025/2026

Abstract

This thesis examines the contradictions of the Green Transition through the lens of climate justice, using the Jadar project in Serbia as case-study that demonstrates extensively how the imperative to deliver Sustainable Development Goals in the shortest possible time can, if mismanaged, lead to violations of environmental rights both substantively and procedurally. The case is peculiarly illustrative not only for analysing in practice how principles of environmental democracy are applied- or sidelined- in decision-making processes, but also for exploring how a constellation of cross-cutting issues interacts in such contexts – ranging from democratic and rule of law backsliding to the silencing of environmental activism. At the same time, the Jadar project offers a unique vantage point from which to examine the broader geopolitical and regulatory dynamics surrounding Critical Raw Materials. As the European Union seeks to secure strategic autonomy in the supply of materials deemed essential for the transition towards a sustainable, low-carbon future, projects like Jadar acquire pivotal relevance. The case-study therefore sheds light on how evolving sustainability objectives- if narrowly framed or pursued through technocratic urgency- can inadvertently reproduce extractive and exploitative logics that externalize harm into sacrifice-zones. It highlights how participatory governance functions as the hinge between legitimacy and injustice, degerming whether strategic projects contribute to a just transition or instead perpetuate the very inequalities and environmental burdens they purport to resolve.
2025
Participatory Governance and Environmental Rights: A Climate Justice Assessment of the Jadar Project
This thesis examines the contradictions of the Green Transition through the lens of climate justice, using the Jadar project in Serbia as case-study that demonstrates extensively how the imperative to deliver Sustainable Development Goals in the shortest possible time can, if mismanaged, lead to violations of environmental rights both substantively and procedurally. The case is peculiarly illustrative not only for analysing in practice how principles of environmental democracy are applied- or sidelined- in decision-making processes, but also for exploring how a constellation of cross-cutting issues interacts in such contexts – ranging from democratic and rule of law backsliding to the silencing of environmental activism. At the same time, the Jadar project offers a unique vantage point from which to examine the broader geopolitical and regulatory dynamics surrounding Critical Raw Materials. As the European Union seeks to secure strategic autonomy in the supply of materials deemed essential for the transition towards a sustainable, low-carbon future, projects like Jadar acquire pivotal relevance. The case-study therefore sheds light on how evolving sustainability objectives- if narrowly framed or pursued through technocratic urgency- can inadvertently reproduce extractive and exploitative logics that externalize harm into sacrifice-zones. It highlights how participatory governance functions as the hinge between legitimacy and injustice, degerming whether strategic projects contribute to a just transition or instead perpetuate the very inequalities and environmental burdens they purport to resolve.
climate justice
sustainability
governance
CRMs
SDG
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
THESIS RACASI MATILDE - FINAL (2).pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.57 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/104834