This comparative study analyzes the musical educational thought of Confucius, Plato, and Aristotle, with the aim of highlighting similarities and differences in their respective philosophical, ethical, and political frameworks. Through the examination of the main classical sources, including Plato’s Republic, Aristotle’s Politics, with reference to his ethical thought, the Lunyu, namely the Analects, and the Liji, namely the Book of Rites, this research shows that, in these three perspectives, music is not understood as a simple form of aesthetic entertainment, but as a practice with moral, educational, and social value. Confucius places music within the ethical framework of ren, namely benevolence, and li, namely ritual and ritual norms, considering it a tool for inner cultivation and social harmony. Plato understands music as a means for the formation of the soul and for the protection of the political order of the polis. Aristotle attributes to music educational, cathartic, and leisure-related functions, emphasizing its role in emotional balance, the formation of virtue, and community life. The comparison shows that, although they are based on different philosophical paradigms, namely Confucius’ relational and ritual ethics, Plato’s political idealism, and Aristotle’s more realistic orientation, all three thinkers assign music an important role in moral education and social cohesion. This comparative perspective not only makes it possible to better understand their respective traditions, but also offers a way to reflect on the educational value of music in contemporary intercultural dialogue.
Questo studio comparativo analizza il pensiero educativo musicale di Confucio, Platone e Aristotele, con l’obiettivo di mettere in luce affinità e differenze nei rispettivi quadri filosofici, etici e politici. Attraverso l’esame delle principali fonti classiche, tra cui la Repubblica di Platone, la Politica di Aristotele, con riferimento alla sua riflessione etica, i Lunyu, cioè gli Analecta, e il Liji, cioè il Libro dei Riti, la ricerca mostra come, in queste tre prospettive, la musica non sia intesa come semplice forma di intrattenimento estetico, ma come pratica dotata di valore morale, educativo e sociale. Confucio colloca la musica all’interno della cornice etica del ren, cioè la benevolenza, e del li, cioè il rito e le norme rituali, considerandola uno strumento di coltivazione interiore e di armonia sociale. Platone la concepisce come mezzo per la formazione dell’anima e per la salvaguardia dell’ordine politico della polis. Aristotele le attribuisce funzioni educative, catartiche e legate al tempo libero, sottolineandone il ruolo nell’equilibrio emotivo, nella formazione della virtù e nella vita comunitaria. Il confronto evidenzia che, pur fondandosi su paradigmi filosofici diversi, cioè l’etica relazionale e rituale di Confucio, l’idealismo politico di Platone e l’orientamento più realistico di Aristotele, tutti e tre attribuiscono alla musica un ruolo importante nell’educazione morale e nella coesione sociale. Questa prospettiva comparata permette non solo di comprendere meglio le rispettive tradizioni, ma anche di riflettere sul valore educativo della musica nel dialogo interculturale contemporaneo.
Studio comparativo del pensiero educativo musicale di Confucio con quello platonico e aristotelico
DING, KE
2025/2026
Abstract
This comparative study analyzes the musical educational thought of Confucius, Plato, and Aristotle, with the aim of highlighting similarities and differences in their respective philosophical, ethical, and political frameworks. Through the examination of the main classical sources, including Plato’s Republic, Aristotle’s Politics, with reference to his ethical thought, the Lunyu, namely the Analects, and the Liji, namely the Book of Rites, this research shows that, in these three perspectives, music is not understood as a simple form of aesthetic entertainment, but as a practice with moral, educational, and social value. Confucius places music within the ethical framework of ren, namely benevolence, and li, namely ritual and ritual norms, considering it a tool for inner cultivation and social harmony. Plato understands music as a means for the formation of the soul and for the protection of the political order of the polis. Aristotle attributes to music educational, cathartic, and leisure-related functions, emphasizing its role in emotional balance, the formation of virtue, and community life. The comparison shows that, although they are based on different philosophical paradigms, namely Confucius’ relational and ritual ethics, Plato’s political idealism, and Aristotle’s more realistic orientation, all three thinkers assign music an important role in moral education and social cohesion. This comparative perspective not only makes it possible to better understand their respective traditions, but also offers a way to reflect on the educational value of music in contemporary intercultural dialogue.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ding_Ke.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
2.36 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/108692