Accurate modeling of extreme precipitation in regions with complex topography, such as Northeastern Italy, remains a major challenge for hydrological risk assessment due to persistent model biases and uncertainties. This thesis investigates the biases and uncertainties associated with sub-daily precipitation extremes derived from an ensemble of high-resolution climate models over Friuli Venezia Giulia. The analysis focuses on mean annual maxima (AM) and 20-year return levels (RL20) for precipitation durations ranging from 1 to 24 hours. Climate model simulations are evaluated against observations from 79 regional rain gauges using statistical, spatial, and elevation-dependent approaches. The results reveal a systematic underestimation of precipitation extremes across all durations and elevation classes. The strongest negative biases and highest uncertainties occur for short-duration precipitation events (1 h and 3 h), particularly in mountainous regions. In contrast, model performance improves progressively with increasing precipitation duration, with the best agreement observed for 12 h and 24 h events, indicating a stronger ability of the models to reproduce large-scale synoptic precipitation compared to localized convective storms. The analysis further demonstrates that 20-year return levels exhibit substantially larger negative biases and greater inter-model uncertainty than mean annual maxima, highlighting the increasing difficulty of reproducing rare and high-intensity precipitation extremes. Although biases generally decrease with increasing duration, significant inter-model spread persists across all temporal scales and elevation classes, indicating considerable structural uncertainty within the climate model ensemble. Overall, the findings highlight the limitations of current high-resolution climate models in representing sub-daily convective precipitation extremes in complex Alpine terrain. The study emphasizes the importance of multi-model ensemble approaches, explicit uncertainty quantification, and bias correction procedures when applying climate model outputs to hydrological design, flood risk assessment, and climate impact studies.

Climate modelling of precipitation extremes in NE Italy: biases and uncertainty

SHARIFITABESH, SANAM
2025/2026

Abstract

Accurate modeling of extreme precipitation in regions with complex topography, such as Northeastern Italy, remains a major challenge for hydrological risk assessment due to persistent model biases and uncertainties. This thesis investigates the biases and uncertainties associated with sub-daily precipitation extremes derived from an ensemble of high-resolution climate models over Friuli Venezia Giulia. The analysis focuses on mean annual maxima (AM) and 20-year return levels (RL20) for precipitation durations ranging from 1 to 24 hours. Climate model simulations are evaluated against observations from 79 regional rain gauges using statistical, spatial, and elevation-dependent approaches. The results reveal a systematic underestimation of precipitation extremes across all durations and elevation classes. The strongest negative biases and highest uncertainties occur for short-duration precipitation events (1 h and 3 h), particularly in mountainous regions. In contrast, model performance improves progressively with increasing precipitation duration, with the best agreement observed for 12 h and 24 h events, indicating a stronger ability of the models to reproduce large-scale synoptic precipitation compared to localized convective storms. The analysis further demonstrates that 20-year return levels exhibit substantially larger negative biases and greater inter-model uncertainty than mean annual maxima, highlighting the increasing difficulty of reproducing rare and high-intensity precipitation extremes. Although biases generally decrease with increasing duration, significant inter-model spread persists across all temporal scales and elevation classes, indicating considerable structural uncertainty within the climate model ensemble. Overall, the findings highlight the limitations of current high-resolution climate models in representing sub-daily convective precipitation extremes in complex Alpine terrain. The study emphasizes the importance of multi-model ensemble approaches, explicit uncertainty quantification, and bias correction procedures when applying climate model outputs to hydrological design, flood risk assessment, and climate impact studies.
2025
Climate modelling of precipitation extremes in NE Italy: biases and uncertainty
Extremeprecipitation
Sub-daily rainfall
Bias assessment
climate model
Hydrology
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sharifitabesh_Sanam.pdf

embargo fino al 14/01/2028

Dimensione 3.11 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.11 MB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/110237