This thesis examines the fall of the Safavid dynasty through the reign of Shah Sultan Husayn (1694–1722). It asks how three groups inside the court, the harem women, the eunuchs and the ulama, came to stand between the Shah and the running of his state, an arrangement the thesis calls the triad of isolation. It traces the origin of that arrangement to the reforms of Shah Abbas I, whose cage system ended the rebellions of princes and left later shahs without experience of government. It follows the growth of the inner court, the rise of the ulama under Muhammad Baqir Majlisi, and the religious policy which contributed, alongside cancelled subsidies and the conduct of provincial governors, to turning the Sunni eastern frontier against the throne. It then sets the Safavid case beside the Ottoman and Mughal empires, which faced comparable pressures without collapsing in the same way, and it asks whether a different ruler could have changed the outcome. The thesis argues that these conditions did not make the collapse inevitable. What the conditions inside the court explain is: why a state with resources could not use them when the crisis arrived.
The Triad of Isolation: Harem, Eunuchs, and Ulama in the Late Safavid State
REZAEIKESHAVAR, AMIRHOSSEIN
2025/2026
Abstract
This thesis examines the fall of the Safavid dynasty through the reign of Shah Sultan Husayn (1694–1722). It asks how three groups inside the court, the harem women, the eunuchs and the ulama, came to stand between the Shah and the running of his state, an arrangement the thesis calls the triad of isolation. It traces the origin of that arrangement to the reforms of Shah Abbas I, whose cage system ended the rebellions of princes and left later shahs without experience of government. It follows the growth of the inner court, the rise of the ulama under Muhammad Baqir Majlisi, and the religious policy which contributed, alongside cancelled subsidies and the conduct of provincial governors, to turning the Sunni eastern frontier against the throne. It then sets the Safavid case beside the Ottoman and Mughal empires, which faced comparable pressures without collapsing in the same way, and it asks whether a different ruler could have changed the outcome. The thesis argues that these conditions did not make the collapse inevitable. What the conditions inside the court explain is: why a state with resources could not use them when the crisis arrived.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thesis.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
1.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/113277