This thesis investigates deep reinforcement learning as a numerical approach to hedging under frictions, through three incremental experiments. First, we replicate a study formulating hedging as a Markov decision process solved with DDPG under transaction costs, in which two critics estimate the first two moments of the cost still to come. Second, we replace that construction with a single distributional critic, which represents the whole distribution of the cost-to-go through a set of quantiles and from which the actor reads a Conditional Value-at-Risk, so that the objective targets the tail of the hedging cost rather than its dispersion. Third, we sweep the risk aversion parameter of both agents, so that the two objectives are compared as families rather than at one setting each. Throughout, the learned strategies are measured against delta hedging on common held-out paths, under constant volatility and under stochastic volatility, and we examine how the objective shapes hedging behaviour: what it costs in the tail, what it costs in the mean, and how far the resulting position departs from the delta it is benchmarked against.

This thesis investigates deep reinforcement learning as a numerical approach to hedging under frictions, through three incremental experiments. First, we replicate a study formulating hedging as a Markov decision process solved with DDPG under transaction costs, in which two critics estimate the first two moments of the cost still to come. Second, we replace that construction with a single distributional critic, which represents the whole distribution of the cost-to-go through a set of quantiles and from which the actor reads a Conditional Value-at-Risk, so that the objective targets the tail of the hedging cost rather than its dispersion. Third, we sweep the risk aversion parameter of both agents, so that the two objectives are compared as families rather than at one setting each. Throughout, the learned strategies are measured against delta hedging on common held-out paths, under constant volatility and under stochastic volatility, and we examine how the objective shapes hedging behaviour: what it costs in the tail, what it costs in the mean, and how far the resulting position departs from the delta it is benchmarked against.

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Option Hedging

FORALOSSO, JACOPO
2025/2026

Abstract

This thesis investigates deep reinforcement learning as a numerical approach to hedging under frictions, through three incremental experiments. First, we replicate a study formulating hedging as a Markov decision process solved with DDPG under transaction costs, in which two critics estimate the first two moments of the cost still to come. Second, we replace that construction with a single distributional critic, which represents the whole distribution of the cost-to-go through a set of quantiles and from which the actor reads a Conditional Value-at-Risk, so that the objective targets the tail of the hedging cost rather than its dispersion. Third, we sweep the risk aversion parameter of both agents, so that the two objectives are compared as families rather than at one setting each. Throughout, the learned strategies are measured against delta hedging on common held-out paths, under constant volatility and under stochastic volatility, and we examine how the objective shapes hedging behaviour: what it costs in the tail, what it costs in the mean, and how far the resulting position departs from the delta it is benchmarked against.
2025
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Option Hedging
This thesis investigates deep reinforcement learning as a numerical approach to hedging under frictions, through three incremental experiments. First, we replicate a study formulating hedging as a Markov decision process solved with DDPG under transaction costs, in which two critics estimate the first two moments of the cost still to come. Second, we replace that construction with a single distributional critic, which represents the whole distribution of the cost-to-go through a set of quantiles and from which the actor reads a Conditional Value-at-Risk, so that the objective targets the tail of the hedging cost rather than its dispersion. Third, we sweep the risk aversion parameter of both agents, so that the two objectives are compared as families rather than at one setting each. Throughout, the learned strategies are measured against delta hedging on common held-out paths, under constant volatility and under stochastic volatility, and we examine how the objective shapes hedging behaviour: what it costs in the tail, what it costs in the mean, and how far the resulting position departs from the delta it is benchmarked against.
Deep Hedging
Options
Machine Learning
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Foralosso_Jacopo.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 955.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
955.05 kB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/115045