In this thesis we combined linear quantile regression with the Jenatton et. al. (2011) overlap group LASSO penalty. An exact and an approximate problem formulations were considered. In order to solve the resulting optimization problem, conjoint ADMM-MM schemes were employed. In the approximated formulation, an explicit upper bound formula for the maximum penalty parameter beyond which all group penalized coefficients are shrunk to zero was derived. We evaluated the empirical properties of the proposed methods through a series of simulations covering linear regression, B-spline smoothing, and scalar-on-function regression scenarios, the latter case presents also a real data application. Overall, the proposed quantile methods outperformed their squared-loss counterparts under error distributions violating standard least-squares assumptions, particularly in all heavy-tailed scenarios and in the majority of (normal) heteroscedastic ones. Crucially, this advantage manifested in estimation and prediction metrics, whereas false positive rate was generally greater than in the squared loss methods. While there is considerable room to refine and extend these frameworks, this work paves the way for further methodological innovations in quantile-based regression.

In this thesis we combined linear quantile regression with the Jenatton et. al. (2011) overlap group LASSO penalty. An exact and an approximate problem formulations were considered. In order to solve the resulting optimization problem, conjoint ADMM-MM schemes were employed. In the approximated formulation, an explicit upper bound formula for the maximum penalty parameter beyond which all group penalized coefficients are shrunk to zero was derived. We evaluated the empirical properties of the proposed methods through a series of simulations covering linear regression, B-spline smoothing, and scalar-on-function regression scenarios, the latter case presents also a real data application. Overall, the proposed quantile methods outperformed their squared-loss counterparts under error distributions violating standard least-squares assumptions, particularly in all heavy-tailed scenarios and in the majority of (normal) heteroscedastic ones. Crucially, this advantage manifested in estimation and prediction metrics, whereas false positive rate was generally greater than in the squared loss methods. While there is considerable room to refine and extend these frameworks, this work paves the way for further methodological innovations in quantile-based regression.

Overlapping group-LASSO for quantile regression: methodology, computation, and functional data applications

STANGHERLIN, PIETRO
2025/2026

Abstract

In this thesis we combined linear quantile regression with the Jenatton et. al. (2011) overlap group LASSO penalty. An exact and an approximate problem formulations were considered. In order to solve the resulting optimization problem, conjoint ADMM-MM schemes were employed. In the approximated formulation, an explicit upper bound formula for the maximum penalty parameter beyond which all group penalized coefficients are shrunk to zero was derived. We evaluated the empirical properties of the proposed methods through a series of simulations covering linear regression, B-spline smoothing, and scalar-on-function regression scenarios, the latter case presents also a real data application. Overall, the proposed quantile methods outperformed their squared-loss counterparts under error distributions violating standard least-squares assumptions, particularly in all heavy-tailed scenarios and in the majority of (normal) heteroscedastic ones. Crucially, this advantage manifested in estimation and prediction metrics, whereas false positive rate was generally greater than in the squared loss methods. While there is considerable room to refine and extend these frameworks, this work paves the way for further methodological innovations in quantile-based regression.
2025
Overlapping group-LASSO for quantile regression: methodology, computation, and functional data applications
In this thesis we combined linear quantile regression with the Jenatton et. al. (2011) overlap group LASSO penalty. An exact and an approximate problem formulations were considered. In order to solve the resulting optimization problem, conjoint ADMM-MM schemes were employed. In the approximated formulation, an explicit upper bound formula for the maximum penalty parameter beyond which all group penalized coefficients are shrunk to zero was derived. We evaluated the empirical properties of the proposed methods through a series of simulations covering linear regression, B-spline smoothing, and scalar-on-function regression scenarios, the latter case presents also a real data application. Overall, the proposed quantile methods outperformed their squared-loss counterparts under error distributions violating standard least-squares assumptions, particularly in all heavy-tailed scenarios and in the majority of (normal) heteroscedastic ones. Crucially, this advantage manifested in estimation and prediction metrics, whereas false positive rate was generally greater than in the squared loss methods. While there is considerable room to refine and extend these frameworks, this work paves the way for further methodological innovations in quantile-based regression.
quantile
group lasso
mm
admm
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Stangherlin_Pietro.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 8.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.35 MB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/115165