This thesis examines how fashion objects come to count as authentic, original or the same despite differences in origin, age and material history. Using Seligman and Weller's concepts of memory, mimesis and metaphor, it compares two cases: counterfeit Louis Vuitton bags and vintage T-shirts. The study combines theoretical analysis with qualitative examination of online communities, resale platforms, specialist websites, journalism and legal and corporate materials. The comparison shows that authenticity is not an inherent property of an object but an organized relationship among material evidence, history, expertise and authority. Louis Vuitton stabilizes authenticity through corporate, retail and legal infrastructure, while the vintage market relies on distributed knowledge among collectors, dealers and online communities. In both cases, memory depends on mimetic practices of repetition and comparison, while metaphor allows objects to stand for heritage, status, cultural participation or access to the past. The thesis argues that real and fake are not simple material opposites: their distinction is produced through infrastructures with unequal power to decide which continuities and resemblances count.

How things count as the same: counterfeits, vintage and the social construction of value in fashion

ILIUSHCHENKO, ALEKSANDRA
2025/2026

Abstract

This thesis examines how fashion objects come to count as authentic, original or the same despite differences in origin, age and material history. Using Seligman and Weller's concepts of memory, mimesis and metaphor, it compares two cases: counterfeit Louis Vuitton bags and vintage T-shirts. The study combines theoretical analysis with qualitative examination of online communities, resale platforms, specialist websites, journalism and legal and corporate materials. The comparison shows that authenticity is not an inherent property of an object but an organized relationship among material evidence, history, expertise and authority. Louis Vuitton stabilizes authenticity through corporate, retail and legal infrastructure, while the vintage market relies on distributed knowledge among collectors, dealers and online communities. In both cases, memory depends on mimetic practices of repetition and comparison, while metaphor allows objects to stand for heritage, status, cultural participation or access to the past. The thesis argues that real and fake are not simple material opposites: their distinction is produced through infrastructures with unequal power to decide which continuities and resemblances count.
2025
How things count as the same: counterfeits, vintage and the social construction of value in fashion
social construction
counterfeits
vintage
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Iliushchenko _thesis_final.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 6.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.94 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/118081