As sustainable finance continues to evolve, the financial materiality of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance remains a subject of intense debate, particularly across divergent regulatory landscapes. This thesis investigates the association between ESG performance, the Cost of Capital (WACC) and operational profitability (ROA). Specifically, it contrasts the European Union's mandate-driven "double materiality" approach with the United States' voluntary, "financial materiality" framework. Utilising a firm-year panel dataset of 5,076 observations from 731 firms retrieved from the Refinitiv Eikon database, the study analyses non-financial constituents of the S&P 500 and the STOXX Europe 600 indices over 2019-2025. The empirical strategy compares Fixed Effects models with firm and calendar-year effects against a preferred specification with firm and region-by-year effects, isolating region-specific macroeconomic shocks. A one-year lagged ESG Score is also used to mitigate reverse-causality concerns. The results show that the negative ESG-WACC association loses significance once region-by-year effects are introduced, while ESG shows no significant association with ROA, and no robust EU-US difference emerges.

As sustainable finance continues to evolve, the financial materiality of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance remains a subject of intense debate, particularly across divergent regulatory landscapes. This thesis investigates the association between ESG performance, the Cost of Capital (WACC) and operational profitability (ROA). Specifically, it contrasts the European Union's mandate-driven "double materiality" approach with the United States' voluntary, "financial materiality" framework. Utilising a firm-year panel dataset of 5,076 observations from 731 firms retrieved from the Refinitiv Eikon database, the study analyses non-financial constituents of the S&P 500 and the STOXX Europe 600 indices over 2019-2025. The empirical strategy compares Fixed Effects models with firm and calendar-year effects against a preferred specification with firm and region-by-year effects, isolating region-specific macroeconomic shocks. A one-year lagged ESG Score is also used to mitigate reverse-causality concerns. The results show that the negative ESG-WACC association loses significance once region-by-year effects are introduced, while ESG shows no significant association with ROA, and no robust EU-US difference emerges.

ESG Performance, Cost of Capital and Operational Profitability: Evidence from the S&P 500 and STOXX Europe 600

GRANATA, LINDA
2025/2026

Abstract

As sustainable finance continues to evolve, the financial materiality of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance remains a subject of intense debate, particularly across divergent regulatory landscapes. This thesis investigates the association between ESG performance, the Cost of Capital (WACC) and operational profitability (ROA). Specifically, it contrasts the European Union's mandate-driven "double materiality" approach with the United States' voluntary, "financial materiality" framework. Utilising a firm-year panel dataset of 5,076 observations from 731 firms retrieved from the Refinitiv Eikon database, the study analyses non-financial constituents of the S&P 500 and the STOXX Europe 600 indices over 2019-2025. The empirical strategy compares Fixed Effects models with firm and calendar-year effects against a preferred specification with firm and region-by-year effects, isolating region-specific macroeconomic shocks. A one-year lagged ESG Score is also used to mitigate reverse-causality concerns. The results show that the negative ESG-WACC association loses significance once region-by-year effects are introduced, while ESG shows no significant association with ROA, and no robust EU-US difference emerges.
2025
ESG Performance, Cost of Capital and Operational Profitability: Evidence from the S&P 500 and STOXX Europe 600
As sustainable finance continues to evolve, the financial materiality of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance remains a subject of intense debate, particularly across divergent regulatory landscapes. This thesis investigates the association between ESG performance, the Cost of Capital (WACC) and operational profitability (ROA). Specifically, it contrasts the European Union's mandate-driven "double materiality" approach with the United States' voluntary, "financial materiality" framework. Utilising a firm-year panel dataset of 5,076 observations from 731 firms retrieved from the Refinitiv Eikon database, the study analyses non-financial constituents of the S&P 500 and the STOXX Europe 600 indices over 2019-2025. The empirical strategy compares Fixed Effects models with firm and calendar-year effects against a preferred specification with firm and region-by-year effects, isolating region-specific macroeconomic shocks. A one-year lagged ESG Score is also used to mitigate reverse-causality concerns. The results show that the negative ESG-WACC association loses significance once region-by-year effects are introduced, while ESG shows no significant association with ROA, and no robust EU-US difference emerges.
ESG
WACC
ROA
S&P 500
Euro Stoxx 600
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Granata_Linda.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 5.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.69 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/118973