In this thesis, I use the European Social Survey from the year 2002 until 2020 to examine the perception of immigration of the first generation immigrants in Europe based on their linguistic time reference. I test the hypothesis that the first generation immigrants who speak languages where the use of a future marker, like “will” in English, is not necessary tend to develop more favorable opinions towards immigration. In other words, the individuals who speak a weak future time reference (Weak FTR) may perceive that future rewards are closer to the present and so they may perceive that the long term benefits of immigration are closer. The results suggest that first generation immigrants who speak a weak FTR develop more favorable opinions about immigration than those who speak a strong FTR.

In this thesis, I use the European Social Survey from the year 2002 until 2020 to examine the perception of immigration of the first generation immigrants in Europe based on their linguistic time reference. I test the hypothesis that the first generation immigrants who speak languages where the use of a future marker, like “will” in English, is not necessary tend to develop more favorable opinions towards immigration. In other words, the individuals who speak a weak future time reference (Weak FTR) may perceive that future rewards are closer to the present and so they may perceive that the long term benefits of immigration are closer. The results suggest that first generation immigrants who speak a weak FTR develop more favorable opinions about immigration than those who speak a strong FTR.

Language, long term orientation and immigrants' perception of immigration

ERRAHAIEM, LILIA
2021/2022

Abstract

In this thesis, I use the European Social Survey from the year 2002 until 2020 to examine the perception of immigration of the first generation immigrants in Europe based on their linguistic time reference. I test the hypothesis that the first generation immigrants who speak languages where the use of a future marker, like “will” in English, is not necessary tend to develop more favorable opinions towards immigration. In other words, the individuals who speak a weak future time reference (Weak FTR) may perceive that future rewards are closer to the present and so they may perceive that the long term benefits of immigration are closer. The results suggest that first generation immigrants who speak a weak FTR develop more favorable opinions about immigration than those who speak a strong FTR.
2021
Language, long term orientation and immigrants' perception of immigration
In this thesis, I use the European Social Survey from the year 2002 until 2020 to examine the perception of immigration of the first generation immigrants in Europe based on their linguistic time reference. I test the hypothesis that the first generation immigrants who speak languages where the use of a future marker, like “will” in English, is not necessary tend to develop more favorable opinions towards immigration. In other words, the individuals who speak a weak future time reference (Weak FTR) may perceive that future rewards are closer to the present and so they may perceive that the long term benefits of immigration are closer. The results suggest that first generation immigrants who speak a weak FTR develop more favorable opinions about immigration than those who speak a strong FTR.
Language
Immigration
Empirical analysis
Europe
Long term
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Errahaiem_Lilia.pdf

embargo fino al 01/12/2025

Dimensione 3.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.23 MB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/40033