Recent literature suggests that co-production of knowledge is a relevant approach to address the complexity of current sustainability challenges. It aims to transform traditional research into a transdisciplinary and more inclusive process that addresses issues such as power relations, the usability of research findings for local stakeholders, and the incorporation of different epistemological traditions. However, success is not always given, and researchers often face a number of challenges. To examine these challenges, I analysed the co-design phase of the "Participatory Modelling for Nature-Based Solutions in the WIO Region" project conducted by the ZMT (Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Research) in collaboration with the IMS (Institute of Marine Sciences), the IHSM (Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography), and the Ministry of Fisheries. Using a case study approach, I focused on two workshops and their contexts in Toliara, Madagascar, and to a limited extent Mafia Island, Tanzania. To collect data, I used a mixed methods approach including interviews with organisers and participants, questionnaires, and participant observation with multiple sources of evidence. Applying qualitative content analysis allowed me to elicit the most important themes regarding peoples’ perceptions of the PaMo project, co-production of knowledge, and the current state of coastal management as well as the inclusion in decision-making. I also embedded my findings in the broader theoretical discourse on the co-production of knowledge. To embed my findings into a broader theoretical discussion I also conducted a literature review.
Recent literature suggests that co-production of knowledge is a relevant approach to address the complexity of current sustainability challenges. It aims to transform traditional research into a transdisciplinary and more inclusive process that addresses issues such as power relations, the usability of research findings for local stakeholders, and the incorporation of different epistemological traditions. However, success is not always given, and researchers often face a number of challenges. To examine these challenges, I analysed the co-design phase of the "Participatory Modelling for Nature-Based Solutions in the WIO Region" project conducted by the ZMT (Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Research) in collaboration with the IMS (Institute of Marine Sciences), the IHSM (Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography), and the Ministry of Fisheries. Using a case study approach, I focused on two workshops and their contexts in Toliara, Madagascar, and to a limited extent Mafia Island, Tanzania. To collect data, I used a mixed methods approach including interviews with organisers and participants, questionnaires, and participant observation with multiple sources of evidence. Applying qualitative content analysis allowed me to elicit the most important themes regarding peoples’ perceptions of the PaMo project, co-production of knowledge, and the current state of coastal management as well as the inclusion in decision-making. I also embedded my findings in the broader theoretical discourse on the co-production of knowledge. To embed my findings into a broader theoretical discussion I also conducted a literature review.
Analysis of the co-production of knowledge in the project “Participatory Modeling for Nature-based Solutions in the WIO-Region”
MAEDER, MINEA SUSANNE
2022/2023
Abstract
Recent literature suggests that co-production of knowledge is a relevant approach to address the complexity of current sustainability challenges. It aims to transform traditional research into a transdisciplinary and more inclusive process that addresses issues such as power relations, the usability of research findings for local stakeholders, and the incorporation of different epistemological traditions. However, success is not always given, and researchers often face a number of challenges. To examine these challenges, I analysed the co-design phase of the "Participatory Modelling for Nature-Based Solutions in the WIO Region" project conducted by the ZMT (Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Research) in collaboration with the IMS (Institute of Marine Sciences), the IHSM (Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography), and the Ministry of Fisheries. Using a case study approach, I focused on two workshops and their contexts in Toliara, Madagascar, and to a limited extent Mafia Island, Tanzania. To collect data, I used a mixed methods approach including interviews with organisers and participants, questionnaires, and participant observation with multiple sources of evidence. Applying qualitative content analysis allowed me to elicit the most important themes regarding peoples’ perceptions of the PaMo project, co-production of knowledge, and the current state of coastal management as well as the inclusion in decision-making. I also embedded my findings in the broader theoretical discourse on the co-production of knowledge. To embed my findings into a broader theoretical discussion I also conducted a literature review.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Minea_Mäder_merged_PDF.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.82 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.82 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/52910