Traditional charitable foundations have historically dominated the philanthropic industry. These organizations have made a lasting impact on society through their vast grant-making activities and community involvement. However, with the emergence of venture philanthropy foundations over the past few decades, the picture has started to change. There are sevral type of these organizations some type of them combine traditional charitable goals with venture capital strategies, aiming for quantifiable results and sustainability in their programs. This research aims to provide a thorough empirical analysis of both traditional charity foundations and venture philanthropy foundations against this changing background in order to determine their financial viability, effectiveness, and accountability. The study examines a sample of 50 organizations from each category using information extracted from and analyzed from the 990 forms, all within the context of the United States. The primary goal is not just to identify the foundation type with the strongest financial standing, ensuring its sustainability, and to comprehend the fundamental causes of such resilience. According to preliminary findings, traditional charitable foundations have their own distinct strengths, despite the fact that venture philanthropy foundations may have some financial advantages due to their emphasis on stringent performance metrics and sustainable impact. Aiming to identify trends and practices that govern financial health, the study also probes these companies' management styles, operational procedures, and financial plans. It is crucial to stress that the aim of this research is not to pit one form of foundation against another in a rivalry. The field of philanthropy is enormous and diversified,and both sorts of foundations serve important and diverse functions. Instead, the study aims to offer detailed insights into each organization's financial architecture, giving stakeholders a clearer perspective when thinking about partnerships or asking for help. In conclusion, it is crucial to comprehend the financial foundations of its major participants as the charitable sector continues its dynamic expansion. This study is a start in that direction by shedding light on the funding strategies of two important foundation kinds and providing suggestions for future charitable undertakings.

Traditional charitable foundations have historically dominated the philanthropic industry. These organizations have made a lasting impact on society through their vast grant-making activities and community involvement. However, with the emergence of venture philanthropy foundations over the past few decades, the picture has started to change. There are sevral type of these organizations some type of them combine traditional charitable goals with venture capital strategies, aiming for quantifiable results and sustainability in their programs. This research aims to provide a thorough empirical analysis of both traditional charity foundations and venture philanthropy foundations against this changing background in order to determine their financial viability, effectiveness, and accountability. The study examines a sample of 50 organizations from each category using information extracted from and analyzed from the 990 forms, all within the context of the United States. The primary goal is not just to identify the foundation type with the strongest financial standing, ensuring its sustainability, and to comprehend the fundamental causes of such resilience. According to preliminary findings, traditional charitable foundations have their own distinct strengths, despite the fact that venture philanthropy foundations may have some financial advantages due to their emphasis on stringent performance metrics and sustainable impact. Aiming to identify trends and practices that govern financial health, the study also probes these companies' management styles, operational procedures, and financial plans. It is crucial to stress that the aim of this research is not to pit one form of foundation against another in a rivalry. The field of philanthropy is enormous and diversified,and both sorts of foundations serve important and diverse functions. Instead, the study aims to offer detailed insights into each organization's financial architecture, giving stakeholders a clearer perspective when thinking about partnerships or asking for help. In conclusion, it is crucial to comprehend the financial foundations of its major participants as the charitable sector continues its dynamic expansion. This study is a start in that direction by shedding light on the funding strategies of two important foundation kinds and providing suggestions for future charitable undertakings.

Financial Sustainability in Philanthropy: A Comparative Analysis of Charitable Foundations and Venture Philanthropy

KARIM NIA, SHEKOOFEH
2022/2023

Abstract

Traditional charitable foundations have historically dominated the philanthropic industry. These organizations have made a lasting impact on society through their vast grant-making activities and community involvement. However, with the emergence of venture philanthropy foundations over the past few decades, the picture has started to change. There are sevral type of these organizations some type of them combine traditional charitable goals with venture capital strategies, aiming for quantifiable results and sustainability in their programs. This research aims to provide a thorough empirical analysis of both traditional charity foundations and venture philanthropy foundations against this changing background in order to determine their financial viability, effectiveness, and accountability. The study examines a sample of 50 organizations from each category using information extracted from and analyzed from the 990 forms, all within the context of the United States. The primary goal is not just to identify the foundation type with the strongest financial standing, ensuring its sustainability, and to comprehend the fundamental causes of such resilience. According to preliminary findings, traditional charitable foundations have their own distinct strengths, despite the fact that venture philanthropy foundations may have some financial advantages due to their emphasis on stringent performance metrics and sustainable impact. Aiming to identify trends and practices that govern financial health, the study also probes these companies' management styles, operational procedures, and financial plans. It is crucial to stress that the aim of this research is not to pit one form of foundation against another in a rivalry. The field of philanthropy is enormous and diversified,and both sorts of foundations serve important and diverse functions. Instead, the study aims to offer detailed insights into each organization's financial architecture, giving stakeholders a clearer perspective when thinking about partnerships or asking for help. In conclusion, it is crucial to comprehend the financial foundations of its major participants as the charitable sector continues its dynamic expansion. This study is a start in that direction by shedding light on the funding strategies of two important foundation kinds and providing suggestions for future charitable undertakings.
2022
Financial Sustainability in Philanthropy: A Comparative Analysis of Charitable Foundations and Venture Philanthropy
Traditional charitable foundations have historically dominated the philanthropic industry. These organizations have made a lasting impact on society through their vast grant-making activities and community involvement. However, with the emergence of venture philanthropy foundations over the past few decades, the picture has started to change. There are sevral type of these organizations some type of them combine traditional charitable goals with venture capital strategies, aiming for quantifiable results and sustainability in their programs. This research aims to provide a thorough empirical analysis of both traditional charity foundations and venture philanthropy foundations against this changing background in order to determine their financial viability, effectiveness, and accountability. The study examines a sample of 50 organizations from each category using information extracted from and analyzed from the 990 forms, all within the context of the United States. The primary goal is not just to identify the foundation type with the strongest financial standing, ensuring its sustainability, and to comprehend the fundamental causes of such resilience. According to preliminary findings, traditional charitable foundations have their own distinct strengths, despite the fact that venture philanthropy foundations may have some financial advantages due to their emphasis on stringent performance metrics and sustainable impact. Aiming to identify trends and practices that govern financial health, the study also probes these companies' management styles, operational procedures, and financial plans. It is crucial to stress that the aim of this research is not to pit one form of foundation against another in a rivalry. The field of philanthropy is enormous and diversified,and both sorts of foundations serve important and diverse functions. Instead, the study aims to offer detailed insights into each organization's financial architecture, giving stakeholders a clearer perspective when thinking about partnerships or asking for help. In conclusion, it is crucial to comprehend the financial foundations of its major participants as the charitable sector continues its dynamic expansion. This study is a start in that direction by shedding light on the funding strategies of two important foundation kinds and providing suggestions for future charitable undertakings.
Financial ratios
Charitable Foundatio
Venture Philanthropy
Sustainability
financials health
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
shekoofeh.karimnia _pdfA.pdf

accesso riservato

Dimensione 1.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.69 MB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/59507