Turbo-prop engines have high propulsive efficiency for moderate subsonic cruise speed. However, their performance rapidly deteriorates as transonic conditions are approached. NASA, through the "Advanced Turboprop Project" (ATP), developed advanced propellers capable of operating at high cruise Mach number, known as prop-fan. This thesis focuses on a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study of SR-3 NASA high speed propeller to investigate the reliability of the numerical model in reproducing experimental performance data at a cruise Mach number of 0.80. The reconstructed blade geometry is simulated using Ansys CFX on a range of advance ratios from 2.9 to 4.1. The results obtained are compared with experimental data provided by NASA; the maximum efficiency obtained from the simulation is 70.9%, compared to the experimentally one 78.2%. In general, efficiency is lower compared to the NASA test cases due to the overestimation of the power coefficient. At an advance ratio of 3.06, the power coefficient is 2.40, whereas the wind tunnel datum is 1.86. As the advance ratio increases, this discrepancy decreases, and the data tends to be more similar to the experimental ones.
CFD study of an advanced high-speed NASA propeller
PACILLI, ANDREA
2023/2024
Abstract
Turbo-prop engines have high propulsive efficiency for moderate subsonic cruise speed. However, their performance rapidly deteriorates as transonic conditions are approached. NASA, through the "Advanced Turboprop Project" (ATP), developed advanced propellers capable of operating at high cruise Mach number, known as prop-fan. This thesis focuses on a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study of SR-3 NASA high speed propeller to investigate the reliability of the numerical model in reproducing experimental performance data at a cruise Mach number of 0.80. The reconstructed blade geometry is simulated using Ansys CFX on a range of advance ratios from 2.9 to 4.1. The results obtained are compared with experimental data provided by NASA; the maximum efficiency obtained from the simulation is 70.9%, compared to the experimentally one 78.2%. In general, efficiency is lower compared to the NASA test cases due to the overestimation of the power coefficient. At an advance ratio of 3.06, the power coefficient is 2.40, whereas the wind tunnel datum is 1.86. As the advance ratio increases, this discrepancy decreases, and the data tends to be more similar to the experimental ones.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Pacilli_Andrea.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
9.52 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.52 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/62225