This study compares the environmental impact of using iron and stainless steel in separator tanks, with a focus on vertical hydraulic separators and buffer tanks in hydronic heating systems. Through a detailed examination of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) investigations, the research emphasizes the advantages and challenges associated with each material. The discussion highlights the crucial roles of vertical hydraulic separators and buffer tanks in optimizing heating system efficiency. In the evaluation of iron tanks, their strong engineering properties, resistance to rust and corrosion, and associated economic benefits are acknowledged. However, the analysis reveals that iron's higher maintenance and replacement requirements contribute to a more significant environmental impact. On the other hand, stainless steel tanks, known for corrosion resistance, durability, and recyclability, emerge as a more environmentally sustainable choice. Despite potential higher upfront costs, the long-term benefits, lower total cost of ownership, and adherence to sustainability goals position stainless steel as a preferable material in separator tank applications.
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of separator tank structural materials
AKBARI, FARZANEH
2023/2024
Abstract
This study compares the environmental impact of using iron and stainless steel in separator tanks, with a focus on vertical hydraulic separators and buffer tanks in hydronic heating systems. Through a detailed examination of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) investigations, the research emphasizes the advantages and challenges associated with each material. The discussion highlights the crucial roles of vertical hydraulic separators and buffer tanks in optimizing heating system efficiency. In the evaluation of iron tanks, their strong engineering properties, resistance to rust and corrosion, and associated economic benefits are acknowledged. However, the analysis reveals that iron's higher maintenance and replacement requirements contribute to a more significant environmental impact. On the other hand, stainless steel tanks, known for corrosion resistance, durability, and recyclability, emerge as a more environmentally sustainable choice. Despite potential higher upfront costs, the long-term benefits, lower total cost of ownership, and adherence to sustainability goals position stainless steel as a preferable material in separator tank applications.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Separator Tank Structural Materials.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
3.56 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.56 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/62446