This research explores the intersection of climate change, environmental degradation, multinational corporations (MNCs), and human rights (HR) violations within the framework of international law. It argues that economic activities, particularly those of MNCs operating within global value chains, significantly contribute to environmental degradation and HR abuses. Despite a well-developed regulatory framework, gaps persist, allowing MNCs to evade accountability for their actions. One potential avenue for addressing these gaps is through the lens of environmental democracy, a relatively new concept that has yet to be fully explored in the context of corporate liability and accountability. The research begins by examining the shortcomings of the current regulatory system, highlighting the lack of state incentive to effectively regulate MNCs and protect citizens from their negative impacts. It then turns to an analysis of environmental democracy, tracing its development and considering its potential implications for addressing corporate environmental degradation and human rights violations. By leveraging environmental democracy as an instrument to pressure states into stronger protections of environmental human rights, the thesis suggests that it can indirectly contribute to greater accountability of MNCs. However, while environmental democracy offers promise as an international instrument for promoting corporate liability and accountability, it is not a panacea. The thesis concludes by identifying other potential improvements to the current regulatory system, emphasising the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing the complex challenges posed by MNCs in the context of environmental and HR protection.

This research explores the intersection of climate change, environmental degradation, multinational corporations (MNCs), and human rights (HR) violations within the framework of international law. It argues that economic activities, particularly those of MNCs operating within global value chains, significantly contribute to environmental degradation and HR abuses. Despite a well-developed regulatory framework, gaps persist, allowing MNCs to evade accountability for their actions. One potential avenue for addressing these gaps is through the lens of environmental democracy, a relatively new concept that has yet to be fully explored in the context of corporate liability and accountability. The research begins by examining the shortcomings of the current regulatory system, highlighting the lack of state incentive to effectively regulate MNCs and protect citizens from their negative impacts. It then turns to an analysis of environmental democracy, tracing its development and considering its potential implications for addressing corporate environmental degradation and human rights violations. By leveraging environmental democracy as an instrument to pressure states into stronger protections of environmental human rights, the thesis suggests that it can indirectly contribute to greater accountability of MNCs. However, while environmental democracy offers promise as an international instrument for promoting corporate liability and accountability, it is not a panacea. The thesis concludes by identifying other potential improvements to the current regulatory system, emphasising the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing the complex challenges posed by MNCs in the context of environmental and HR protection.

Environmental Democracy: An international instrument to increase multinational corporations' accountability and liability for environmental degradation and human rights violations

LEVANIĆ, TOMISLAV
2023/2024

Abstract

This research explores the intersection of climate change, environmental degradation, multinational corporations (MNCs), and human rights (HR) violations within the framework of international law. It argues that economic activities, particularly those of MNCs operating within global value chains, significantly contribute to environmental degradation and HR abuses. Despite a well-developed regulatory framework, gaps persist, allowing MNCs to evade accountability for their actions. One potential avenue for addressing these gaps is through the lens of environmental democracy, a relatively new concept that has yet to be fully explored in the context of corporate liability and accountability. The research begins by examining the shortcomings of the current regulatory system, highlighting the lack of state incentive to effectively regulate MNCs and protect citizens from their negative impacts. It then turns to an analysis of environmental democracy, tracing its development and considering its potential implications for addressing corporate environmental degradation and human rights violations. By leveraging environmental democracy as an instrument to pressure states into stronger protections of environmental human rights, the thesis suggests that it can indirectly contribute to greater accountability of MNCs. However, while environmental democracy offers promise as an international instrument for promoting corporate liability and accountability, it is not a panacea. The thesis concludes by identifying other potential improvements to the current regulatory system, emphasising the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing the complex challenges posed by MNCs in the context of environmental and HR protection.
2023
Environmental Democracy: An international instrument to increase multinational corporations' accountability and liability for environmental degradation and human rights violations
This research explores the intersection of climate change, environmental degradation, multinational corporations (MNCs), and human rights (HR) violations within the framework of international law. It argues that economic activities, particularly those of MNCs operating within global value chains, significantly contribute to environmental degradation and HR abuses. Despite a well-developed regulatory framework, gaps persist, allowing MNCs to evade accountability for their actions. One potential avenue for addressing these gaps is through the lens of environmental democracy, a relatively new concept that has yet to be fully explored in the context of corporate liability and accountability. The research begins by examining the shortcomings of the current regulatory system, highlighting the lack of state incentive to effectively regulate MNCs and protect citizens from their negative impacts. It then turns to an analysis of environmental democracy, tracing its development and considering its potential implications for addressing corporate environmental degradation and human rights violations. By leveraging environmental democracy as an instrument to pressure states into stronger protections of environmental human rights, the thesis suggests that it can indirectly contribute to greater accountability of MNCs. However, while environmental democracy offers promise as an international instrument for promoting corporate liability and accountability, it is not a panacea. The thesis concludes by identifying other potential improvements to the current regulatory system, emphasising the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing the complex challenges posed by MNCs in the context of environmental and HR protection.
natural environment
democracy
MNCs
human rights
accountability
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tomislav_Levanić_2078579.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 2.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/67925