This thesis explores the legal and socio-political considerations underpinning the United Kingdom's decision to establish and subsequently repeal the Rwanda asylum scheme. The study critically examines the legislative framework and international legal obligations that influenced the policy's inception, including human rights conventions and asylum seeker protocols. It further analyzes the socio-political dynamics, such as public opinion, political party agendas, and media narratives, that shaped governmental decisions. Through a comprehensive review of parliamentary debates, policy documents, and expert interviews, the research delineates the contentious interplay between national sovereignty and international responsibilities. It also addresses the broader implications for UK immigration policy and its alignment with global standards.
This thesis explores the legal and socio-political considerations underpinning the United Kingdom's decision to establish and subsequently repeal the Rwanda asylum scheme. The study critically examines the legislative framework and international legal obligations that influenced the policy's inception, including human rights conventions and asylum seeker protocols. It further analyzes the socio-political dynamics, such as public opinion, political party agendas, and media narratives, that shaped governmental decisions. Through a comprehensive review of parliamentary debates, policy documents, and expert interviews, the research delineates the contentious interplay between national sovereignty and international responsibilities. It also addresses the broader implications for UK immigration policy and its alignment with global standards.
The legal and socio-political considerations behind the UK's decision to establish and repeal the Rwanda asylum scheme.
MENON, ALESSIA
2023/2024
Abstract
This thesis explores the legal and socio-political considerations underpinning the United Kingdom's decision to establish and subsequently repeal the Rwanda asylum scheme. The study critically examines the legislative framework and international legal obligations that influenced the policy's inception, including human rights conventions and asylum seeker protocols. It further analyzes the socio-political dynamics, such as public opinion, political party agendas, and media narratives, that shaped governmental decisions. Through a comprehensive review of parliamentary debates, policy documents, and expert interviews, the research delineates the contentious interplay between national sovereignty and international responsibilities. It also addresses the broader implications for UK immigration policy and its alignment with global standards.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Alessia_Menon_2073568.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.61 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.61 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/75035