This study conducts a comparative analysis of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) systems in China and the European Union (EU), focusing on their adoption, regulatory frameworks, and societal implications. While China has implemented one of the most extensive FRT systems globally, the EU exhibits a more cautious approach, characterized by stricter regulations and nuanced societal acceptance. The research begins with an overview of the fundamental mechanisms and characteristics of FRT, providing a foundation for understanding its applications. It then explores the adoption and integration of FRT in public and private sectors within both regions, examining societal and demographic attitudes toward the technology. Key issues such as security, personal privacy, and data protection are critically analyzed to assess the broader implications of FRT's usage. Through detailed case studies, the study evaluates the effectiveness and practicability of existing legal frameworks governing FRT in China and the EU, aiming to identify the strengths and limitations of each approach. By highlighting the complex interplay between technological advancements, societal values, and regulatory challenges, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the ethical and practical dimensions of FRT deployment in contrasting political and cultural contexts.
This study conducts a comparative analysis of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) systems in China and the European Union (EU), focusing on their adoption, regulatory frameworks, and societal implications. While China has implemented one of the most extensive FRT systems globally, the EU exhibits a more cautious approach, characterized by stricter regulations and nuanced societal acceptance. The research begins with an overview of the fundamental mechanisms and characteristics of FRT, providing a foundation for understanding its applications. It then explores the adoption and integration of FRT in public and private sectors within both regions, examining societal and demographic attitudes toward the technology. Key issues such as security, personal privacy, and data protection are critically analyzed to assess the broader implications of FRT's usage. Through detailed case studies, the study evaluates the effectiveness and practicability of existing legal frameworks governing FRT in China and the EU, aiming to identify the strengths and limitations of each approach. By highlighting the complex interplay between technological advancements, societal values, and regulatory challenges, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the ethical and practical dimensions of FRT deployment in contrasting political and cultural contexts.
EVALUATION OF FACE RECOGNITION SYSTEMS IN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
EYNIHAN KESKIN, ELIF
2024/2025
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative analysis of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) systems in China and the European Union (EU), focusing on their adoption, regulatory frameworks, and societal implications. While China has implemented one of the most extensive FRT systems globally, the EU exhibits a more cautious approach, characterized by stricter regulations and nuanced societal acceptance. The research begins with an overview of the fundamental mechanisms and characteristics of FRT, providing a foundation for understanding its applications. It then explores the adoption and integration of FRT in public and private sectors within both regions, examining societal and demographic attitudes toward the technology. Key issues such as security, personal privacy, and data protection are critically analyzed to assess the broader implications of FRT's usage. Through detailed case studies, the study evaluates the effectiveness and practicability of existing legal frameworks governing FRT in China and the EU, aiming to identify the strengths and limitations of each approach. By highlighting the complex interplay between technological advancements, societal values, and regulatory challenges, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the ethical and practical dimensions of FRT deployment in contrasting political and cultural contexts.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
06032025 Elif Keskin Thesis-2.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
481.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
481.08 kB | Adobe PDF |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/84003