We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.
We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.
MIP formulations for Delete-free AI Planning
ZANELLA, MATTEO
2024/2025
Abstract
We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Zanella_Matteo.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.06 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.06 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/90728