We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.

We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.

MIP formulations for Delete-free AI Planning

ZANELLA, MATTEO
2024/2025

Abstract

We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.
2024
MIP formulations for Delete-free AI Planning
We compare current state-of-the-art MIP formulations for solving the delete-free relaxation in cost-optimal planning, integrating various preprocessing techniques from different publications and developing primal heuristics to provide warm-start solutions to the MIP solver. We then explore a novel approach to model acyclicity by computing violated landmarks and subtour elimination constraints (S.E.C.), adding them as constraints: computing all landmarks a priori is intractable, since the number of potential landmarks grows exponentially with the problem size, just like S.E.C., making any brute-force approach computationally infeasible; instead we employ a constraint generation approach where new constraints are identified dynamically: upon encountering an infeasible solution, we detect violated cuts within that solution and incorporate them as additional constraints, progressively constructing a constraint set required for both feasibility and optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that this landmark-based formulation achieves competitive performance with existing methods in both space and time efficiency.
MIP
AI Planning
Delete-free
Landmarks
IPC Domains
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Zanella_Matteo.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/90728