This thesis develops and validates a penalty‑free, size‑adaptive optimization framework for calibrating large‑scale water distribution networks (15–5000 variables). By integrating population‑based metaheuristics with constrained policy‑optimization agents, the framework dynamically selects the most effective solver based on network dimensionality and constraint features. Novel normalization methods and feasibility‑preserving operators ensure hard constraint satisfaction (e.g., loss coefficient and roughness coefficient) without external penalties, demonstrating effective convergence across diverse network configurations. These results establish guiding principles for adaptive algorithm selection in constrained, high‑dimensional optimization and demonstrate broad applicability across engineering systems.

This thesis develops and validates a penalty‑free, size‑adaptive optimization framework for calibrating large‑scale water distribution networks (15–5000 variables). By integrating population‑based metaheuristics with constrained policy‑optimization agents, the framework dynamically selects the most effective solver based on network dimensionality and constraint features. Novel normalization methods and feasibility‑preserving operators ensure hard constraint satisfaction (e.g., loss coefficient and roughness coefficient) without external penalties, demonstrating effective convergence across diverse network configurations. These results establish guiding principles for adaptive algorithm selection in constrained, high‑dimensional optimization and demonstrate broad applicability across engineering systems.

Comparative Analysis of Constraint-Handling Optimization Algorithms for Large-Scale Water Distribution Systems

ŞENOL, BERKER
2024/2025

Abstract

This thesis develops and validates a penalty‑free, size‑adaptive optimization framework for calibrating large‑scale water distribution networks (15–5000 variables). By integrating population‑based metaheuristics with constrained policy‑optimization agents, the framework dynamically selects the most effective solver based on network dimensionality and constraint features. Novel normalization methods and feasibility‑preserving operators ensure hard constraint satisfaction (e.g., loss coefficient and roughness coefficient) without external penalties, demonstrating effective convergence across diverse network configurations. These results establish guiding principles for adaptive algorithm selection in constrained, high‑dimensional optimization and demonstrate broad applicability across engineering systems.
2024
Comparative Analysis of Constraint-Handling Optimization Algorithms for Large-Scale Water Distribution Systems
This thesis develops and validates a penalty‑free, size‑adaptive optimization framework for calibrating large‑scale water distribution networks (15–5000 variables). By integrating population‑based metaheuristics with constrained policy‑optimization agents, the framework dynamically selects the most effective solver based on network dimensionality and constraint features. Novel normalization methods and feasibility‑preserving operators ensure hard constraint satisfaction (e.g., loss coefficient and roughness coefficient) without external penalties, demonstrating effective convergence across diverse network configurations. These results establish guiding principles for adaptive algorithm selection in constrained, high‑dimensional optimization and demonstrate broad applicability across engineering systems.
Optimization
Metaheuristics
Hydraulics
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SENOL_BERKER.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 365.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
365.11 kB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/96068