.

Background. The management of cT3 glottic carcinoma remains debated between organ-preserving strategies (surgical and non-surgical) and total laryngectomy (TL). We evaluated long-term oncologic outcomes and functional profiles, exploring the impact of posterior compartment involvement. Methods. Multicenter retrospective study of 115 cT3 patients treated between 2007 and 2022 across Italian centers; groups: OPHL (n=64), TL (n=22), and non-surgical protocols (definitive radiotherapy [RT] or concurrent chemoradiotherapy [cCRT], with or without induction chemotherapy [IC]) (n=29). Median follow-up was 67.6 months. Endopoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and locoregional control (LRC), analyzed with Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. A functional subcohort (n=13) underwent MDADI, EORTC QLQ-HN35, FOIS/DOSS, FEES/VFSS with the PAS, YALE, DIGEST Scale and “Padova Score” and a predefined protocol for vocal-function assessment. Results. No significant differences emerged among approaches for OS, DFS, DSS, LC, or LRC (log-rank p: 0.133; 0.895; 0.601; 0.151; 0.520). In the three-arm comparison, LC was worse in the TL group (log-rank 0.009), plausibly reflecting a higher rate of close/positive margins and a slightly larger share of pT4a cases. Posterior compartment involvement did not significantly affect OS/DFS/DSS, although there was a trend toward better survival when the posterior compartment uninvolved. In the functional subcohort: mean FOIS 6.5 and mean DOSS 6.15 indicate near-complete oral intake. A nasogastric tube was required in 11/13 (mean removal at 12 days); tracheostomy in 11/13 with decannulation in all OPHL cases (mean 62 days). No between-group comparisons could be conducted regarding the functional data. Conclusions. In cT3 glottic carcinoma, OPHL, TL, and non-surgical protocols yield comparable survival; TL does not guarantee superior local control and remains sensitive to margin status. Extension to the posterior compartment alone should not preclude laryngeal-preservation strategies. Swallowing outcomes appear generally favorable, but a larger and mor homogeneous cohorts are needed for robust comparative analysis. Treatment selection should integrate imaging, laryngeal compartmentalization, and expected function to maximize organ preservation without compromising oncologic efficacy.

Long-term oncological and functional outcomes of laryngeal compartmentalization in the multidisciplinary management of cT3 glottic carcinoma: a multicenter Italian study

BATTISTUZZI, VERONICA
2023/2024

Abstract

.
2023
Long-term oncological and functional outcomes of laryngeal compartmentalization in the multidisciplinary management of cT3 glottic carcinoma: a multicenter Italian study
Background. The management of cT3 glottic carcinoma remains debated between organ-preserving strategies (surgical and non-surgical) and total laryngectomy (TL). We evaluated long-term oncologic outcomes and functional profiles, exploring the impact of posterior compartment involvement. Methods. Multicenter retrospective study of 115 cT3 patients treated between 2007 and 2022 across Italian centers; groups: OPHL (n=64), TL (n=22), and non-surgical protocols (definitive radiotherapy [RT] or concurrent chemoradiotherapy [cCRT], with or without induction chemotherapy [IC]) (n=29). Median follow-up was 67.6 months. Endopoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and locoregional control (LRC), analyzed with Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. A functional subcohort (n=13) underwent MDADI, EORTC QLQ-HN35, FOIS/DOSS, FEES/VFSS with the PAS, YALE, DIGEST Scale and “Padova Score” and a predefined protocol for vocal-function assessment. Results. No significant differences emerged among approaches for OS, DFS, DSS, LC, or LRC (log-rank p: 0.133; 0.895; 0.601; 0.151; 0.520). In the three-arm comparison, LC was worse in the TL group (log-rank 0.009), plausibly reflecting a higher rate of close/positive margins and a slightly larger share of pT4a cases. Posterior compartment involvement did not significantly affect OS/DFS/DSS, although there was a trend toward better survival when the posterior compartment uninvolved. In the functional subcohort: mean FOIS 6.5 and mean DOSS 6.15 indicate near-complete oral intake. A nasogastric tube was required in 11/13 (mean removal at 12 days); tracheostomy in 11/13 with decannulation in all OPHL cases (mean 62 days). No between-group comparisons could be conducted regarding the functional data. Conclusions. In cT3 glottic carcinoma, OPHL, TL, and non-surgical protocols yield comparable survival; TL does not guarantee superior local control and remains sensitive to margin status. Extension to the posterior compartment alone should not preclude laryngeal-preservation strategies. Swallowing outcomes appear generally favorable, but a larger and mor homogeneous cohorts are needed for robust comparative analysis. Treatment selection should integrate imaging, laryngeal compartmentalization, and expected function to maximize organ preservation without compromising oncologic efficacy.
laryngeal carcinoma
cT3 glottic cancer
oncological outcomes
functional outcomes
multicenter study
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tesi specializzazione completa Battistuzzi_pdfA.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 1.09 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.09 MB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/97761