This thesis investigates whether ESG ratings accurately reflect corporate human rights performance. While ESG has become a key benchmark for corporate sustainability, its ability to capture social and human rights outcomes remains uncertain. Using Refinitiv data for firms listed in the STOXX Europe 600 and S&P 500 between 2010 and 2025, the study analyzes whether human rights controversies affect ESG scores. Combining cross-sectional and panel regressions, it also examines potential trade-offs between the environmental and social pillars and compares how firms in Europe and the United States respond to human rights controversies under different regulatory contexts. The research aims to clarify whether ESG ratings serve as reliable indicators of human rights accountability or primarily reflect corporate disclosure practices.

This thesis investigates whether ESG ratings accurately reflect corporate human rights performance. While ESG has become a key benchmark for corporate sustainability, its ability to capture social and human rights outcomes remains uncertain. Using Refinitiv data for firms listed in the STOXX Europe 600 and S&P 500 between 2010 and 2025, the study analyzes whether human rights controversies affect ESG scores. Combining cross-sectional and panel regressions, it also examines potential trade-offs between the environmental and social pillars and compares how firms in Europe and the United States respond to human rights controversies under different regulatory contexts. The research aims to clarify whether ESG ratings serve as reliable indicators of human rights accountability or primarily reflect corporate disclosure practices.

Do ESG Ratings Capture Human Rights Performance? Evidence from European and U.S. Firms

MICHALAK, YOHANN, NICOLAS
2024/2025

Abstract

This thesis investigates whether ESG ratings accurately reflect corporate human rights performance. While ESG has become a key benchmark for corporate sustainability, its ability to capture social and human rights outcomes remains uncertain. Using Refinitiv data for firms listed in the STOXX Europe 600 and S&P 500 between 2010 and 2025, the study analyzes whether human rights controversies affect ESG scores. Combining cross-sectional and panel regressions, it also examines potential trade-offs between the environmental and social pillars and compares how firms in Europe and the United States respond to human rights controversies under different regulatory contexts. The research aims to clarify whether ESG ratings serve as reliable indicators of human rights accountability or primarily reflect corporate disclosure practices.
2024
Do ESG Ratings Capture Human Rights Performance? Evidence from European and U.S. Firms
This thesis investigates whether ESG ratings accurately reflect corporate human rights performance. While ESG has become a key benchmark for corporate sustainability, its ability to capture social and human rights outcomes remains uncertain. Using Refinitiv data for firms listed in the STOXX Europe 600 and S&P 500 between 2010 and 2025, the study analyzes whether human rights controversies affect ESG scores. Combining cross-sectional and panel regressions, it also examines potential trade-offs between the environmental and social pillars and compares how firms in Europe and the United States respond to human rights controversies under different regulatory contexts. The research aims to clarify whether ESG ratings serve as reliable indicators of human rights accountability or primarily reflect corporate disclosure practices.
ESG Ratings
Human Rights
Sustainability
listed firms
performance
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Yohann_Michalak.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 9.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/98657