Among the many activities that have accompanied the evolution of human history, warfare is one of the most recurring: from antiquity to our contemporary age, it has been in constant transformation. Battles, whether large or small, have always been studied in depth, with rivers of ink devoted to these events. Yet war does not end with a single battle, nor are armies summoned forth from nothing at a given moment: there must be an organization capable of bringing together, sustaining, and managing the often invisible military activities. The task that, for centuries, had been assumed by the Roman Empire was then inherited by the new barbarian elites. But in what manner did they organize their military structure? Whereas we possess relatively abundant documentation for the Late Middle Ages, the Early Middle Ages more closely resembles that dark age so often imagined. Sources of a normative character are scarce and documentary evidence scarcer still, yet they allow us to sketch—albeit faintly—what it meant to organize and administer the machinery of war from late antiquity to the early medieval period. Armies may fight with the sword, but they are organized with the pen.
Tra le tante attività che accompagnano l’evoluzione della storia dell’uomo, la guerra è una delle più comuni: dai tempi antichi alla nostra contemporaneità, essa è sempre in continua evoluzione. Le battaglie, grandi o piccole, sono studiate a fondo, fiumi di inchiostro sono stati scritti su questi eventi, molte di loro inciampano nella storia controfattuale, ma una guerra non si esaurisce nella singola battaglia, gli eserciti non si formano al momento dal nulla: c’è bisogno di una organizzazione che possa riunire, mantenere e gestire le attività militari invisibili. Il compito che per decenni ha occupato l’Impero Romano, passa di mano alle nuove élite barbariche, ma in che modo essi organizzano la macchina militare? Se disponiamo di una discreta documentazione per il Basso Medioevo, l’Alto Medioevo è più simile a quella età oscura che tutti s’immaginano. Poche sono le fonti normative e ancor meno le fonti documentarie, ma esse ci permettono di tracciare un quadro - seppur accennato - di ciò che significa organizzare e gestire la macchina bellica dal tardoantico all’Alto Medioevo. Gli eserciti combattono con la spada, ma si organizzano con l’inchiostro.
Con l'inchiostro e con la spada. Fonti documentarie e gestione amministrativa degli eserciti fra Tardoantico e Alto Medioevo.
LUCHIN, TOMAS
2024/2025
Abstract
Among the many activities that have accompanied the evolution of human history, warfare is one of the most recurring: from antiquity to our contemporary age, it has been in constant transformation. Battles, whether large or small, have always been studied in depth, with rivers of ink devoted to these events. Yet war does not end with a single battle, nor are armies summoned forth from nothing at a given moment: there must be an organization capable of bringing together, sustaining, and managing the often invisible military activities. The task that, for centuries, had been assumed by the Roman Empire was then inherited by the new barbarian elites. But in what manner did they organize their military structure? Whereas we possess relatively abundant documentation for the Late Middle Ages, the Early Middle Ages more closely resembles that dark age so often imagined. Sources of a normative character are scarce and documentary evidence scarcer still, yet they allow us to sketch—albeit faintly—what it meant to organize and administer the machinery of war from late antiquity to the early medieval period. Armies may fight with the sword, but they are organized with the pen.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Luchin_Tomas.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
729.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
729.01 kB | Adobe PDF |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/101144