This dissertation investigates the relationship between language and women’s oppression, with particular attention to how linguistic structures and usage both reflect and perpetuate gender inequality. The first chapter provides a historical and theoretical overview of the origins of women’s oppression in language, examining how grammatical conventions were largely shaped by male perspectives and identifying the linguistic features that contribute to gender bias. The second chapter reviews key scholarly contributions to the field, while also addressing the role of corpora in linguistic research, outlining their methodological advantages and limitations. Additionally, it discusses potential strategies for addressing linguistic inequality and promoting more inclusive language practices. The third and central chapter presents a corpus-based analysis of political discourse, focusing on the collocation of the gendered terms woman/women, lady/ladies and feminism/feminist within the Hansard Corpus. Through a comparative examination of usage patterns in the first two decades of the twentieth century and in 1960 to 1970, the study aims to reveal shifts in the representation of gendered terms in political contexts and parliamentary discourses, thereby contributing to broader discussions on the intersection of language, power, and gender.

This dissertation investigates the relationship between language and women’s oppression, with particular attention to how linguistic structures and usage both reflect and perpetuate gender inequality. The first chapter provides a historical and theoretical overview of the origins of women’s oppression in language, examining how grammatical conventions were largely shaped by male perspectives and identifying the linguistic features that contribute to gender bias. The second chapter reviews key scholarly contributions to the field, while also addressing the role of corpora in linguistic research, outlining their methodological advantages and limitations. Additionally, it discusses potential strategies for addressing linguistic inequality and promoting more inclusive language practices. The third and central chapter presents a corpus-based analysis of political discourse, focusing on the collocation of the gendered terms woman/women, lady/ladies and feminism/feminist within the Hansard Corpus. Through a comparative examination of usage patterns in the first two decades of the twentieth century and in 1960 to 1970, the study aims to reveal shifts in the representation of gendered terms in political contexts and parliamentary discourses, thereby contributing to broader discussions on the intersection of language, power, and gender.

Gender, Power and Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Women’s Representation in Parliamentary Debates

FIORENZATO, MATILDE
2024/2025

Abstract

This dissertation investigates the relationship between language and women’s oppression, with particular attention to how linguistic structures and usage both reflect and perpetuate gender inequality. The first chapter provides a historical and theoretical overview of the origins of women’s oppression in language, examining how grammatical conventions were largely shaped by male perspectives and identifying the linguistic features that contribute to gender bias. The second chapter reviews key scholarly contributions to the field, while also addressing the role of corpora in linguistic research, outlining their methodological advantages and limitations. Additionally, it discusses potential strategies for addressing linguistic inequality and promoting more inclusive language practices. The third and central chapter presents a corpus-based analysis of political discourse, focusing on the collocation of the gendered terms woman/women, lady/ladies and feminism/feminist within the Hansard Corpus. Through a comparative examination of usage patterns in the first two decades of the twentieth century and in 1960 to 1970, the study aims to reveal shifts in the representation of gendered terms in political contexts and parliamentary discourses, thereby contributing to broader discussions on the intersection of language, power, and gender.
2024
Gender, Power and Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Women’s Representation in Parliamentary Debates
This dissertation investigates the relationship between language and women’s oppression, with particular attention to how linguistic structures and usage both reflect and perpetuate gender inequality. The first chapter provides a historical and theoretical overview of the origins of women’s oppression in language, examining how grammatical conventions were largely shaped by male perspectives and identifying the linguistic features that contribute to gender bias. The second chapter reviews key scholarly contributions to the field, while also addressing the role of corpora in linguistic research, outlining their methodological advantages and limitations. Additionally, it discusses potential strategies for addressing linguistic inequality and promoting more inclusive language practices. The third and central chapter presents a corpus-based analysis of political discourse, focusing on the collocation of the gendered terms woman/women, lady/ladies and feminism/feminist within the Hansard Corpus. Through a comparative examination of usage patterns in the first two decades of the twentieth century and in 1960 to 1970, the study aims to reveal shifts in the representation of gendered terms in political contexts and parliamentary discourses, thereby contributing to broader discussions on the intersection of language, power, and gender.
Gender
Power
Language
Feminism
Corpus
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fiorenzato_Matilde.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 696.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
696.79 kB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/101929