Lysimachus of Thrace, one of Alexander the Great’s Diadochi, remains one of the most complex and elusive figures of the early Hellenistic period, largely due to the fragmentary and often anecdotal nature of the ancient sources. A companion and bodyguard of Alexander, later ruler of Thrace, Macedonia, and parts of Asia Minor, Lysimachus is portrayed in ancient historiography as a tyrant, a formidable general, and an irascible king, resulting in a contradictory and problematic image. This thesis aims to critically examine these portrayals by comparing the main ancient sources (Diodorus Siculus, Plutarch, Justin, Pausanias, Strabo, Arrian, and Appian) with modern scholarship, in order to distinguish historically reliable elements from legendary or heavily reworked traditions. By analyzing the political context following Alexander’s death and the struggles among the Diadochi, the study seeks to reassess Lysimachus’ role as a key political and military actor, highlighting his importance in the formation of early Hellenistic kingdoms and in the development of Hellenistic kingship.
La figura di Lisimaco di Tracia, uno dei Diadochi di Alessandro Magno, rappresenta ancora oggi una delle personalità più complesse e difficili da ricostruire del primo periodo ellenistico, a causa della frammentarietà e della natura spesso aneddotica delle fonti antiche. Compagno di Alessandro, sua guardia del corpo e successivamente sovrano di Tracia, Macedonia e parte dell’Asia Minore, Lisimaco è stato variamente descritto dalla storiografia antica come tiranno, condottiero valoroso e re iracondo, dando origine a un’immagine contraddittoria e problematica. Il presente elaborato si propone di analizzare criticamente tali rappresentazioni, confrontando le principali fonti antiche (Diodoro Siculo, Plutarco, Giustino, Pausania, Strabone, Arriano e Appiano) con la storiografia moderna, al fine di distinguere gli elementi storicamente attendibili dalle rielaborazioni leggendarie. Attraverso lo studio del contesto successivo alla morte di Alessandro Magno e delle dinamiche delle guerre tra i Diadochi, la ricerca intende ricollocare Lisimaco nel suo ruolo di protagonista politico e militare, mettendo in luce il suo contributo alla formazione dei primi regni ellenistici e alla definizione delle pratiche del potere monarchico.
Lisimaco di Tracia tra storia e leggenda. Per un'immagine regale di Lisimaco, dall'ascesa al declino.
GIOVEDI', GIULIO FRANCO
2025/2026
Abstract
Lysimachus of Thrace, one of Alexander the Great’s Diadochi, remains one of the most complex and elusive figures of the early Hellenistic period, largely due to the fragmentary and often anecdotal nature of the ancient sources. A companion and bodyguard of Alexander, later ruler of Thrace, Macedonia, and parts of Asia Minor, Lysimachus is portrayed in ancient historiography as a tyrant, a formidable general, and an irascible king, resulting in a contradictory and problematic image. This thesis aims to critically examine these portrayals by comparing the main ancient sources (Diodorus Siculus, Plutarch, Justin, Pausanias, Strabo, Arrian, and Appian) with modern scholarship, in order to distinguish historically reliable elements from legendary or heavily reworked traditions. By analyzing the political context following Alexander’s death and the struggles among the Diadochi, the study seeks to reassess Lysimachus’ role as a key political and military actor, highlighting his importance in the formation of early Hellenistic kingdoms and in the development of Hellenistic kingship.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
pdf A. Tesi.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/104051