This thesis analyzes the role of scientific evidence in criminal trial, with particular attention to technical expertise provided by both in-court and out-of-court experts, with a key distinction between experts and expert witness in cross-examination. It then analyzes the role of the US expert witness and the differences with the Italian legal system, and finally the role of the psychiatrist as an expert witness.
In questa tesi si analizza il ruolo della prova scientifica nel processo penale, con particolare attenzione alla consulenza tecnica di parte, sia endoperitale che extraperitale, con una centrale distinzione tra perito e consulente tecnico in materia di cross examination, si analizza successivamente il ruolo dell'Expert Witness statunitense e le differenze con il nostro ordinamento italiano e infine il ruolo dello psichiatra come consulente tecnico di parte.
La consulenza tecnica nel processo penale
SCIACCA, ANNA
2025/2026
Abstract
This thesis analyzes the role of scientific evidence in criminal trial, with particular attention to technical expertise provided by both in-court and out-of-court experts, with a key distinction between experts and expert witness in cross-examination. It then analyzes the role of the US expert witness and the differences with the Italian legal system, and finally the role of the psychiatrist as an expert witness.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sciacca Anna La consulenza tecnica nel processo penale .pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
1.45 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/106187