Insanity evaluation, in the field of forensic science, has always been faced with numerous challenges regarding its reliability, and integration with other approaches, such as neuroimaging techniques, could help mitigate this problem. Since the interpretation of neuroimaging data and the creation of its corresponding report are done by human experts, it is vulnerable to errors, that we call cognitive bias. This study aims to investigate how the types of information presented with the neuroradiological data could tap into these biases and affect how the experts create their neuroradiological reports.

Insanity evaluation, in the field of forensic science, has always been faced with numerous challenges regarding its reliability, and integration with other approaches, such as neuroimaging techniques, could help mitigate this problem. Since the interpretation of neuroimaging data and the creation of its corresponding report are done by human experts, it is vulnerable to errors, that we call cognitive bias. This study aims to investigate how the types of information presented with the neuroradiological data could tap into these biases and affect how the experts create their neuroradiological reports.

Cognitive Bias in Neuroimaging: A Study on How Information Affects Neuroradiological Reports

WIJAYA, JANET LOUISA
2021/2022

Abstract

Insanity evaluation, in the field of forensic science, has always been faced with numerous challenges regarding its reliability, and integration with other approaches, such as neuroimaging techniques, could help mitigate this problem. Since the interpretation of neuroimaging data and the creation of its corresponding report are done by human experts, it is vulnerable to errors, that we call cognitive bias. This study aims to investigate how the types of information presented with the neuroradiological data could tap into these biases and affect how the experts create their neuroradiological reports.
2021
Cognitive Bias in Neuroimaging: A Study on How Information Affects Neuroradiological Reports
Insanity evaluation, in the field of forensic science, has always been faced with numerous challenges regarding its reliability, and integration with other approaches, such as neuroimaging techniques, could help mitigate this problem. Since the interpretation of neuroimaging data and the creation of its corresponding report are done by human experts, it is vulnerable to errors, that we call cognitive bias. This study aims to investigate how the types of information presented with the neuroradiological data could tap into these biases and affect how the experts create their neuroradiological reports.
Cognitive bias
Forensic Science
Neuroimaging
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Wijaya_Janet Louisa.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 949.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
949.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/37041