With the development of internationally led state-building, external actors increased their willingness to exercise authority and intervene in the domestic affairs of countries, with peace being the end goal. However, many scholars analyzing the state-building process point out recurring problems and shortcomings resulting from externally assisted state-building. States in fragile situations and hybrid political orders tend to exhibit issues of legitimacy that pose a fundamental challenge to the state-building process. The thesis analyzes the conflicting sources of legitimacy through the role of international and domestic actors in the state-building process in Kosovo. The methodological approach used is an analysis of the two most comprehensive peace- and state-building missions in Kosovo – the UNMIK and EULEX. Hence, the thesis explores the correlation between the presence of influential actors and their stakes and agendas and Kosovo’s political elites as constellations of power. The results show that external actors working in fragile contexts need to invest more effort in acquiring a detailed understanding of the local sources of legitimacy, rather than creating a false appearance of change in their efforts to build the newest ‘state-in-waiting’ in Europe.

With the development of internationally led state-building, external actors increased their willingness to exercise authority and intervene in the domestic affairs of countries, with peace being the end goal. However, many scholars analyzing the state-building process point out recurring problems and shortcomings resulting from externally assisted state-building. States in fragile situations and hybrid political orders tend to exhibit issues of legitimacy that pose a fundamental challenge to the state-building process. The thesis analyzes the conflicting sources of legitimacy through the role of international and domestic actors in the state-building process in Kosovo. The methodological approach used is an analysis of the two most comprehensive peace- and state-building missions in Kosovo – the UNMIK and EULEX. Hence, the thesis explores the correlation between the presence of influential actors and their stakes and agendas and Kosovo’s political elites as constellations of power. The results show that external actors working in fragile contexts need to invest more effort in acquiring a detailed understanding of the local sources of legitimacy, rather than creating a false appearance of change in their efforts to build the newest ‘state-in-waiting’ in Europe.

Kosovo: An Analysis on State-building and the Role of EU and International Actors

NESTOROSKI, ANTONIO
2022/2023

Abstract

With the development of internationally led state-building, external actors increased their willingness to exercise authority and intervene in the domestic affairs of countries, with peace being the end goal. However, many scholars analyzing the state-building process point out recurring problems and shortcomings resulting from externally assisted state-building. States in fragile situations and hybrid political orders tend to exhibit issues of legitimacy that pose a fundamental challenge to the state-building process. The thesis analyzes the conflicting sources of legitimacy through the role of international and domestic actors in the state-building process in Kosovo. The methodological approach used is an analysis of the two most comprehensive peace- and state-building missions in Kosovo – the UNMIK and EULEX. Hence, the thesis explores the correlation between the presence of influential actors and their stakes and agendas and Kosovo’s political elites as constellations of power. The results show that external actors working in fragile contexts need to invest more effort in acquiring a detailed understanding of the local sources of legitimacy, rather than creating a false appearance of change in their efforts to build the newest ‘state-in-waiting’ in Europe.
2022
Kosovo: An Analysis on State-building and the Role of EU and International Actors
With the development of internationally led state-building, external actors increased their willingness to exercise authority and intervene in the domestic affairs of countries, with peace being the end goal. However, many scholars analyzing the state-building process point out recurring problems and shortcomings resulting from externally assisted state-building. States in fragile situations and hybrid political orders tend to exhibit issues of legitimacy that pose a fundamental challenge to the state-building process. The thesis analyzes the conflicting sources of legitimacy through the role of international and domestic actors in the state-building process in Kosovo. The methodological approach used is an analysis of the two most comprehensive peace- and state-building missions in Kosovo – the UNMIK and EULEX. Hence, the thesis explores the correlation between the presence of influential actors and their stakes and agendas and Kosovo’s political elites as constellations of power. The results show that external actors working in fragile contexts need to invest more effort in acquiring a detailed understanding of the local sources of legitimacy, rather than creating a false appearance of change in their efforts to build the newest ‘state-in-waiting’ in Europe.
State-building
Kosovo
Legitimacy
EULEX
Rule of Law
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Kosovo An Analysis on State-building and the Role of EU and International Actors.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 858.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
858.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/45207