Covering building rooftops with vegetation [green roofs (GR)] holds promise as a climate change adaptation strategy in cities through the provision of ecosystem services, such as, lowering building temperatures, reducing stormwater runoff, and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there is a need for more studies that quantify these potential ecosystem services and evaluate how they are impacted by design and management practices. This work aims to evaluate three selected ecosystem services (reduction of GHGs, cooling of the microclimate, and stormwater management) and how they are affected by abiotic and biotic components of their design and management—i.e., vegetation type, substrate depth, and irrigation regime. We sought to test this by comparing daytime GHG emissions (i.e., CO2, CH4, and N2O), daily substrate temperatures, and the water balance of 48 GR microcosms in north-eastern Italy during an entire year. Four vegetation types (Sedum spp., cold season grasses, warm season grasses, or wildflowers), two substrate depths (8 or 14 cm), and two irrigation levels (1 or 2 L m-2 day-1) were evaluated, for a total of 16 treatments with 3 replicates.

Covering building rooftops with vegetation [green roofs (GR)] holds promise as a climate change adaptation strategy in cities through the provision of ecosystem services, such as, lowering building temperatures, reducing stormwater runoff, and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there is a need for more studies that quantify these potential ecosystem services and evaluate how they are impacted by design and management practices. This work aims to evaluate three selected ecosystem services (reduction of GHGs, cooling of the microclimate, and stormwater management) and how they are affected by abiotic and biotic components of their design and management—i.e., vegetation type, substrate depth, and irrigation regime. We sought to test this by comparing daytime GHG emissions (i.e., CO2, CH4, and N2O), daily substrate temperatures, and the water balance of 48 GR microcosms in north-eastern Italy during an entire year. Four vegetation types (Sedum spp., cold season grasses, warm season grasses, or wildflowers), two substrate depths (8 or 14 cm), and two irrigation levels (1 or 2 L m-2 day-1) were evaluated, for a total of 16 treatments with 3 replicates.

Green roofs as a climate change adaptation strategy in cities: Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions, substrate temperatures, and water balance in north-eastern Italy

LUGO ARROYO, ALEXANDRA MARIE
2022/2023

Abstract

Covering building rooftops with vegetation [green roofs (GR)] holds promise as a climate change adaptation strategy in cities through the provision of ecosystem services, such as, lowering building temperatures, reducing stormwater runoff, and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there is a need for more studies that quantify these potential ecosystem services and evaluate how they are impacted by design and management practices. This work aims to evaluate three selected ecosystem services (reduction of GHGs, cooling of the microclimate, and stormwater management) and how they are affected by abiotic and biotic components of their design and management—i.e., vegetation type, substrate depth, and irrigation regime. We sought to test this by comparing daytime GHG emissions (i.e., CO2, CH4, and N2O), daily substrate temperatures, and the water balance of 48 GR microcosms in north-eastern Italy during an entire year. Four vegetation types (Sedum spp., cold season grasses, warm season grasses, or wildflowers), two substrate depths (8 or 14 cm), and two irrigation levels (1 or 2 L m-2 day-1) were evaluated, for a total of 16 treatments with 3 replicates.
2022
Green roofs as a climate change adaptation strategy in cities: Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions, substrate temperatures, and water balance in north-eastern Italy
Covering building rooftops with vegetation [green roofs (GR)] holds promise as a climate change adaptation strategy in cities through the provision of ecosystem services, such as, lowering building temperatures, reducing stormwater runoff, and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there is a need for more studies that quantify these potential ecosystem services and evaluate how they are impacted by design and management practices. This work aims to evaluate three selected ecosystem services (reduction of GHGs, cooling of the microclimate, and stormwater management) and how they are affected by abiotic and biotic components of their design and management—i.e., vegetation type, substrate depth, and irrigation regime. We sought to test this by comparing daytime GHG emissions (i.e., CO2, CH4, and N2O), daily substrate temperatures, and the water balance of 48 GR microcosms in north-eastern Italy during an entire year. Four vegetation types (Sedum spp., cold season grasses, warm season grasses, or wildflowers), two substrate depths (8 or 14 cm), and two irrigation levels (1 or 2 L m-2 day-1) were evaluated, for a total of 16 treatments with 3 replicates.
blue-green roof
carbon dioxide
methane
nitrous oxide
ecosystem services
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LugoArroyoAlexandra-Thesis UNIPD PDFA.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 2.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.54 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/49966