Lying to identity: analysis of latencies from interviews.

Detecting liars of personal identities is becoming an increasingly important goal. However, an obstacle to this endeavor is that deceivers can prepare a "lie script" prior to investigative interviews, producing narratives that are indistinguishable from those of truth tellers. To overcome this limitation, specific interview techniques have been developed that pose cognitive disadvantages for deceivers, such as including unexpected questions alongside control and expected questions. Unexpected questions can be considered a "rehearsal averting strategy" since liars cannot anticipate and prepare responses in advance. Consequently, when confronted with unexpected questions, liars are compelled to generate an immediate deceptive statement, inhibit the truth, and replace it with a fabricated narrative, while ensuring that the deception remains undetectable to the interviewer. This process of information reconstruction leads to increased response times and error rates for unexpected questions. Even truth tellers will experience an increase in cognitive load when responding to unexpected questions, but their responses, based on genuine memory traces, will be more comparable. The purpose of this study is to assess whether it is possible to discriminate between identity liars and truth tellers by analyzing response times and errors obtained from face-to-face interviews that implement unexpected questions.