This thesis conducts a comparative analysis of the guidelines currently adopted by ANSFISA for road and railway bridges, particularly focusing on the evaluation and mitigation of landslide risks, with a statistical in-depth study. It presents both sets of guidelines, identifying the main differences and similarities in evaluation criteria and intervention techniques. Through statistical analysis, data on incidents caused by landslides involving bridges and viaducts are examined to identify the most recurrent risk factors and the geological and anthropogenic conditions that favor them. Based on the collected evidence, suggestions are proposed for optimizing the existing guidelines, highlighting the importance of an integrated approach that considers prevention, continuous monitoring, and the adoption of advanced technologies for risk management. The results of this thesis aim to contribute to the improvement of infrastructure safety, offering practical and innovative recommendations for protection against landslide phenomena.
Questo elaborato effettua un’analisi comparativa delle linee guida attualmente adottate da ANSFISA per ponti stradali e ferroviari, in particolare per la valutazione e mitigazione del rischio di frane, con un approfondimento statistico. Presentando le due normative e identificando le principali differenze e similitudini nei criteri di valutazione e nelle tecniche di intervento. Attraverso un’analisi statistica, si esaminano i dati relativi a incidenti causati da frane che hanno coinvolto ponti e viadotti, con l’obiettivo di individuare i fattori di rischio più ricorrenti e le condizioni geologiche e antropiche che li favoriscono. Sulla base delle evidenze raccolte, vengono proposti suggerimenti per l’ottimizzazione delle linee guida esistenti, evidenziando l’importanza di un approccio integrato che consideri la prevenzione, il monitoraggio continuo e l’adozione di tecnologie avanzate per la gestione del rischio. I risultati di questa tesi mirano a contribuire al miglioramento della sicurezza delle infrastrutture, offrendo raccomandazioni pratiche e innovative per la protezione contro i fenomeni franosi.
Sicurezza contro il rischio di frane per ponti, viadotti stradali e ferroviari: analisi comparativa delle linee guida, approfondimento statistico e suggerimenti per l'ottimizzazione
TITONE, GIOVANNI
2023/2024
Abstract
This thesis conducts a comparative analysis of the guidelines currently adopted by ANSFISA for road and railway bridges, particularly focusing on the evaluation and mitigation of landslide risks, with a statistical in-depth study. It presents both sets of guidelines, identifying the main differences and similarities in evaluation criteria and intervention techniques. Through statistical analysis, data on incidents caused by landslides involving bridges and viaducts are examined to identify the most recurrent risk factors and the geological and anthropogenic conditions that favor them. Based on the collected evidence, suggestions are proposed for optimizing the existing guidelines, highlighting the importance of an integrated approach that considers prevention, continuous monitoring, and the adoption of advanced technologies for risk management. The results of this thesis aim to contribute to the improvement of infrastructure safety, offering practical and innovative recommendations for protection against landslide phenomena.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Titone_Giovanni.pdf
embargo fino al 16/04/2026
Dimensione
5.26 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/73746