This thesis examines the role of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in safeguarding human rights and democratic principles against state-led digital repression in Latin American democracies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focusing on Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador, it explores the extent to which NHRIs effectively counterbalance digital repression in democracies through institutional mechanisms, public advocacy, and collaboration with other human rights networks. Through an analysis of digital surveillance, online censorship, internet shutdowns, online manipulation, and the persecution of online users, this research analyzes the limitations of NHRIs in mitigating state overreach in the digital sphere and its direct effect on civil society. The findings suggest that while NHRIs are mandated to protect fundamental rights, their responses remain constrained by political pressures, limited enforcement capacities, and insufficient regional coordination. This study contributes to the growing body of research on digital authoritarianism and offers insights into strengthening human rights protections and assessments in an increasingly digitalized political landscape.
The modernization of repression and resistance: The rise of state-led digital repression in Latin America and the role of National Human Rights Institutions
CARVAJAL SOJO, MARIANA
2024/2025
Abstract
This thesis examines the role of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in safeguarding human rights and democratic principles against state-led digital repression in Latin American democracies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focusing on Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador, it explores the extent to which NHRIs effectively counterbalance digital repression in democracies through institutional mechanisms, public advocacy, and collaboration with other human rights networks. Through an analysis of digital surveillance, online censorship, internet shutdowns, online manipulation, and the persecution of online users, this research analyzes the limitations of NHRIs in mitigating state overreach in the digital sphere and its direct effect on civil society. The findings suggest that while NHRIs are mandated to protect fundamental rights, their responses remain constrained by political pressures, limited enforcement capacities, and insufficient regional coordination. This study contributes to the growing body of research on digital authoritarianism and offers insights into strengthening human rights protections and assessments in an increasingly digitalized political landscape.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mariana-CarvajalSojo-2085976 _ HRMLG F.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.21 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.21 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/88250