The subject of this study begins with an examination of the tax system applicable to capital companies, and in particular to closely held limited liability companies (S.r.l. a ristretta base), as well as the relationship between these companies and their shareholders. The study then proceeds to analyze the pathological scenario in which the taxpayer omits the declaration of profits in the income tax return; in this regard, it will be observed how the Tax Authority would be required to prove the existence of hidden additional income if the presumption of profit distribution in closely held companies did not apply. The main focus of this study is precisely this jurisprudential presumption, which entails a reversal of the burden of proof and, moreover, imposes a "probatio diabolica" on such companies.
L'oggetto del presente studio comincia da una disamina del sistema di tassazione in capo alle società di capitali e, in particolare, in capo alle S.r.l. a ristretta base, nonché del rapporto tra esse società ed i soci che ne sono parte. Lo studio procede con l'analisi della fattispecie patologica in cui il contribuente nella dichiarazione dei redditi ometta la presenza di utili; a tal proposito, si osserverà in che modo il Fisco sarebbe tenuto a fornire la prova dell'esistenza di maggiori ricavi occulti se non sussistesse la presunzione di distribuzione di utili nelle società a ristretta base. L'oggetto principale del presente studio è proprio tale presunzione di natura giurisprudenziale, la quale comporta un'inversione dell'onere della prova e, per di più, una probatio diabolica in capo a tali società.
"La presunzione di occulta distribuzione di utili extracontabili"
MAPPA, ALESSANDRO
2024/2025
Abstract
The subject of this study begins with an examination of the tax system applicable to capital companies, and in particular to closely held limited liability companies (S.r.l. a ristretta base), as well as the relationship between these companies and their shareholders. The study then proceeds to analyze the pathological scenario in which the taxpayer omits the declaration of profits in the income tax return; in this regard, it will be observed how the Tax Authority would be required to prove the existence of hidden additional income if the presumption of profit distribution in closely held companies did not apply. The main focus of this study is precisely this jurisprudential presumption, which entails a reversal of the burden of proof and, moreover, imposes a "probatio diabolica" on such companies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mappa_Alessandro.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.29 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/93305