This thesis evaluates the sustainability performance of vertical farming (VF) by reassessing early theoretical claims through the framework of selected United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 2, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). A narrative literature review (2018–2025) is combined with observational insights from a two-month internship at AlmaVFarm, an enclosed, LED-lit vertical farm at the University of Bologna. The review maps how VF was initially expected to address food insecurity, water use, climate impacts, land degradation and urban employment, and compares these expectations with recent evidence and practical outcomes. Findings show that VF reliably produces high-quality, pesticide-free crops and offers strong water-saving performance and near-complete nutrient containment, supporting SDGs 2, 6 and 14. However, high energy demand, capital intensity and a narrow crop range limit its ability to contribute to affordable staple foods or large-scale poverty reduction. Carbon footprint results are strongly dependent on the energy mix, and land-sparing benefits are constrained by upstream energy requirements. While commercial VF ventures face economic and labour challenges, community-oriented and educational farms demonstrate clear social value. Overall, VF emerges as a context-dependent, complementary strategy capable of advancing specific SDGs when aligned with appropriate energy, design and governance conditions.

This thesis evaluates the sustainability performance of vertical farming (VF) by reassessing early theoretical claims through the framework of selected United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 2, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). A narrative literature review (2018–2025) is combined with observational insights from a two-month internship at AlmaVFarm, an enclosed, LED-lit vertical farm at the University of Bologna. The review maps how VF was initially expected to address food insecurity, water use, climate impacts, land degradation and urban employment, and compares these expectations with recent evidence and practical outcomes. Findings show that VF reliably produces high-quality, pesticide-free crops and offers strong water-saving performance and near-complete nutrient containment, supporting SDGs 2, 6 and 14. However, high energy demand, capital intensity and a narrow crop range limit its ability to contribute to affordable staple foods or large-scale poverty reduction. Carbon footprint results are strongly dependent on the energy mix, and land-sparing benefits are constrained by upstream energy requirements. While commercial VF ventures face economic and labour challenges, community-oriented and educational farms demonstrate clear social value. Overall, VF emerges as a context-dependent, complementary strategy capable of advancing specific SDGs when aligned with appropriate energy, design and governance conditions.

Vertical farming through the SDG lens: promises, limitations and real-world performance

SATTAROVA, MADINA
2024/2025

Abstract

This thesis evaluates the sustainability performance of vertical farming (VF) by reassessing early theoretical claims through the framework of selected United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 2, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). A narrative literature review (2018–2025) is combined with observational insights from a two-month internship at AlmaVFarm, an enclosed, LED-lit vertical farm at the University of Bologna. The review maps how VF was initially expected to address food insecurity, water use, climate impacts, land degradation and urban employment, and compares these expectations with recent evidence and practical outcomes. Findings show that VF reliably produces high-quality, pesticide-free crops and offers strong water-saving performance and near-complete nutrient containment, supporting SDGs 2, 6 and 14. However, high energy demand, capital intensity and a narrow crop range limit its ability to contribute to affordable staple foods or large-scale poverty reduction. Carbon footprint results are strongly dependent on the energy mix, and land-sparing benefits are constrained by upstream energy requirements. While commercial VF ventures face economic and labour challenges, community-oriented and educational farms demonstrate clear social value. Overall, VF emerges as a context-dependent, complementary strategy capable of advancing specific SDGs when aligned with appropriate energy, design and governance conditions.
2024
Vertical farming through the SDG lens: promises, limitations and real-world performance
This thesis evaluates the sustainability performance of vertical farming (VF) by reassessing early theoretical claims through the framework of selected United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 2, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). A narrative literature review (2018–2025) is combined with observational insights from a two-month internship at AlmaVFarm, an enclosed, LED-lit vertical farm at the University of Bologna. The review maps how VF was initially expected to address food insecurity, water use, climate impacts, land degradation and urban employment, and compares these expectations with recent evidence and practical outcomes. Findings show that VF reliably produces high-quality, pesticide-free crops and offers strong water-saving performance and near-complete nutrient containment, supporting SDGs 2, 6 and 14. However, high energy demand, capital intensity and a narrow crop range limit its ability to contribute to affordable staple foods or large-scale poverty reduction. Carbon footprint results are strongly dependent on the energy mix, and land-sparing benefits are constrained by upstream energy requirements. While commercial VF ventures face economic and labour challenges, community-oriented and educational farms demonstrate clear social value. Overall, VF emerges as a context-dependent, complementary strategy capable of advancing specific SDGs when aligned with appropriate energy, design and governance conditions.
vertical farming
urban agriculture
food security
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VF Thesis November Madina Sattarova (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 4.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.49 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/99321