This research investigates whether, and under what conditions, a philosophical community of inquiry, rethought through the integration of Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL), can be understood as a pedagogical device capable of promoting inclusion, participation and self-determination in educational and social contexts. Starting from this research question, the work develops and tests Philosophy for All, a situated and innovative proposal emerging from the intersection between dialogical practice and inclusive design. Rather than simply applying P4C to a new context, it aims to outline a third pedagogical-methodological dimension, intended to make philosophical experience more accessible, plural and responsive to the variability of participants. The study adopts a qualitative and exploratory approach and takes place in the La Spezia area, in the Ligurian municipality of Lerici, through a pathway involving a heterogeneous adult group. It reconstructs the theoretical and methodological framework of the proposal, its field implementation, and the role of the local network composed of institutions, associations, facilitators, artists and participants. This network assumes a specific pedagogical value, as it supports access to the pathway, fosters its continuity and roots the philosophical experience within a real context of relationships. After an initial phase conducted according to the standard P4C method, the project introduces alternative stimuli from a UDL perspective, through textual, visual, musical, sensorimotor and symbolic mediators. The materials collected show that access to philosophical inquiry requires a process-oriented design, capable of rethinking stimuli, setting and expressive forms in relation to the concrete characteristics of the community. The work also presents the main nuclei of the philosophical analysis conducted with the participants, constantly connecting the theoretical framework, field experience and meanings constructed through dialogue. Inclusion, freedom, recognition, belonging and participation are therefore interpreted not only as pedagogical categories, but as questions elaborated by the community throughout the experience. From this perspective, the stimuli designed through a UDL approach show, also through participants’ feedback, the possibility of broadening access to philosophical inquiry without reducing its depth. Overall, Philosophy for All is interpreted as an initial pedagogical architecture oriented toward modelling and transferability, useful for facilitators, educators and researchers interested in designing more accessible and generative communities of inquiry, capable of sustaining shared thinking, local bonds and more concrete conditions for self-determination.
Il presente lavoro indaga se e a quali condizioni una comunità di ricerca filosofica, ripensata attraverso l’integrazione tra Philosophy for Children (P4C) e Universal Design for Learning (UDL), possa configurarsi come dispositivo pedagogico capace di promuovere inclusione, partecipazione e autodeterminazione nei contesti educativi e sociali. A partire da questa domanda, viene elaborata e sperimentata Philosophy for All, una proposta situata e innovativa, nata dall’intreccio tra pratica dialogica e progettazione inclusiva. Essa non si limita ad applicare la P4C a un nuovo contesto, ma intende delineare una terza dimensione pedagogico-metodologica, orientata a rendere l’esperienza filosofica più accessibile, plurale e sensibile alla variabilità dei partecipanti. L’indagine, di natura qualitativa ed esplorativa, si sviluppa nel territorio spezzino, nel comune ligure di Lerici, attraverso un percorso rivolto a un gruppo adulto ed eterogeneo. Vengono ricostruiti l’impianto teorico-metodologico della proposta, la sua attuazione sul campo e il ruolo della rete territoriale composta da istituzioni, associazioni, facilitatori, artisti e partecipanti. Tale rete assume un valore pedagogico specifico, poiché sostiene l’accesso al percorso, ne favorisce la continuità e radica la pratica filosofica in un contesto reale di relazioni. Dopo una prima fase condotta secondo il metodo standard della P4C, il progetto introduce stimoli alternativi in prospettiva UDL, attraverso mediatori testuali, visivi, musicali, senso-motori e simbolici. Dai materiali raccolti emerge che l’accessibilità della ricerca filosofica richiede una progettazione processuale, capace di ripensare stimoli, setting e forme espressive in rapporto alle caratteristiche concrete della comunità. Il lavoro restituisce inoltre i nuclei dell’analisi filosofica condotta con i partecipanti, mettendo costantemente in relazione cornice teorica, esperienza sul campo e significati costruiti nel dialogo. Inclusione, libertà, riconoscimento, appartenenza e partecipazione vengono così letti non solo come categorie pedagogiche, ma come questioni elaborate dalla comunità nel corso dell’esperienza. In questa prospettiva, gli stimoli progettati in chiave UDL mostrano, anche attraverso le restituzioni dei partecipanti, la possibilità di ampliare l’accesso all’indagine filosofica senza ridurne la profondità. Nel complesso, Philosophy for All viene interpretato come una prima architettura pedagogica orientata alla modellizzazione e alla trasferibilità, utile a facilitatori, educatori e ricercatori interessati a progettare comunità di ricerca più accessibili, generative e capaci di sostenere pensiero condiviso, legami territoriali e condizioni più concrete di autodeterminazione.
Philosopy for All: pratiche dialogiche per l’autodeterminazione nei contesti educativi e sociali
PASQUALI, MARINO
2025/2026
Abstract
This research investigates whether, and under what conditions, a philosophical community of inquiry, rethought through the integration of Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL), can be understood as a pedagogical device capable of promoting inclusion, participation and self-determination in educational and social contexts. Starting from this research question, the work develops and tests Philosophy for All, a situated and innovative proposal emerging from the intersection between dialogical practice and inclusive design. Rather than simply applying P4C to a new context, it aims to outline a third pedagogical-methodological dimension, intended to make philosophical experience more accessible, plural and responsive to the variability of participants. The study adopts a qualitative and exploratory approach and takes place in the La Spezia area, in the Ligurian municipality of Lerici, through a pathway involving a heterogeneous adult group. It reconstructs the theoretical and methodological framework of the proposal, its field implementation, and the role of the local network composed of institutions, associations, facilitators, artists and participants. This network assumes a specific pedagogical value, as it supports access to the pathway, fosters its continuity and roots the philosophical experience within a real context of relationships. After an initial phase conducted according to the standard P4C method, the project introduces alternative stimuli from a UDL perspective, through textual, visual, musical, sensorimotor and symbolic mediators. The materials collected show that access to philosophical inquiry requires a process-oriented design, capable of rethinking stimuli, setting and expressive forms in relation to the concrete characteristics of the community. The work also presents the main nuclei of the philosophical analysis conducted with the participants, constantly connecting the theoretical framework, field experience and meanings constructed through dialogue. Inclusion, freedom, recognition, belonging and participation are therefore interpreted not only as pedagogical categories, but as questions elaborated by the community throughout the experience. From this perspective, the stimuli designed through a UDL approach show, also through participants’ feedback, the possibility of broadening access to philosophical inquiry without reducing its depth. Overall, Philosophy for All is interpreted as an initial pedagogical architecture oriented toward modelling and transferability, useful for facilitators, educators and researchers interested in designing more accessible and generative communities of inquiry, capable of sustaining shared thinking, local bonds and more concrete conditions for self-determination.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pasquali Marino.pdf.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
2.56 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.56 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/112328