In this literature review, I tackle the question of: Why is atypical development increasing, and how can we understand these mechanisms to interpret child development and its disorders? It is critical to remember that development should be seen as a complex dynamic process, which needs to be fully understood before delving into developmental disorders. Even though child development follows a predictable pathway with a level of understanding, not every child develops the same way and may vary to some extent. However, a child’s development trajectory is distinctive from typical development when showing a larger dysfunction in one or more of the developmental milestones. Therefore, we begin by focusing on distinguishing typical from atypical development, with the exploration of the two main independent frameworks: Neuroconstructivism, and Epigenetics, that are linked to the explanation of developmental disorders such as Williams Syndrome, ADHD, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, and Autism, etc. The importance of this study is that it deepens our theoretical understanding of atypical development and its manifestation in developmental disorders, by fully supporting that the mentioned fundamental frameworks should interact in a multidirectional manner when exploring different disorders, rather than in a single model, as well as the idea of comparing syndromes between each other rather than a set of typical controls. The key takeaway is that these complex conducts can be viewed as behaviours which follow various pathways with different trajectories on a continuum of developmental possibilities.

In this literature review, I tackle the question of: Why is atypical development increasing, and how can we understand these mechanisms to interpret child development and its disorders? It is critical to remember that development should be seen as a complex dynamic process, which needs to be fully understood before delving into developmental disorders. Even though child development follows a predictable pathway with a level of understanding, not every child develops the same way and may vary to some extent. However, a child’s development trajectory is distinctive from typical development when showing a larger dysfunction in one or more of the developmental milestones. Therefore, we begin by focusing on distinguishing typical from atypical development, with the exploration of the two main independent frameworks: Neuroconstructivism, and Epigenetics, that are linked to the explanation of developmental disorders such as Williams Syndrome, ADHD, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, and Autism, etc. The importance of this study is that it deepens our theoretical understanding of atypical development and its manifestation in developmental disorders, by fully supporting that the mentioned fundamental frameworks should interact in a multidirectional manner when exploring different disorders, rather than in a single model, as well as the idea of comparing syndromes between each other rather than a set of typical controls. The key takeaway is that these complex conducts can be viewed as behaviours which follow various pathways with different trajectories on a continuum of developmental possibilities.

Why is Atypical Development Increasing, and How Can We Understand these Mechanism to Interpret Child Development and its Disorders?

CONROY BEDOYA, CAMILLA
2021/2022

Abstract

In this literature review, I tackle the question of: Why is atypical development increasing, and how can we understand these mechanisms to interpret child development and its disorders? It is critical to remember that development should be seen as a complex dynamic process, which needs to be fully understood before delving into developmental disorders. Even though child development follows a predictable pathway with a level of understanding, not every child develops the same way and may vary to some extent. However, a child’s development trajectory is distinctive from typical development when showing a larger dysfunction in one or more of the developmental milestones. Therefore, we begin by focusing on distinguishing typical from atypical development, with the exploration of the two main independent frameworks: Neuroconstructivism, and Epigenetics, that are linked to the explanation of developmental disorders such as Williams Syndrome, ADHD, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, and Autism, etc. The importance of this study is that it deepens our theoretical understanding of atypical development and its manifestation in developmental disorders, by fully supporting that the mentioned fundamental frameworks should interact in a multidirectional manner when exploring different disorders, rather than in a single model, as well as the idea of comparing syndromes between each other rather than a set of typical controls. The key takeaway is that these complex conducts can be viewed as behaviours which follow various pathways with different trajectories on a continuum of developmental possibilities.
2021
Why is Atypical Development Increasing, and How Can We Understand these Mechanism to Interpret Child Development and its Disorders?
In this literature review, I tackle the question of: Why is atypical development increasing, and how can we understand these mechanisms to interpret child development and its disorders? It is critical to remember that development should be seen as a complex dynamic process, which needs to be fully understood before delving into developmental disorders. Even though child development follows a predictable pathway with a level of understanding, not every child develops the same way and may vary to some extent. However, a child’s development trajectory is distinctive from typical development when showing a larger dysfunction in one or more of the developmental milestones. Therefore, we begin by focusing on distinguishing typical from atypical development, with the exploration of the two main independent frameworks: Neuroconstructivism, and Epigenetics, that are linked to the explanation of developmental disorders such as Williams Syndrome, ADHD, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, and Autism, etc. The importance of this study is that it deepens our theoretical understanding of atypical development and its manifestation in developmental disorders, by fully supporting that the mentioned fundamental frameworks should interact in a multidirectional manner when exploring different disorders, rather than in a single model, as well as the idea of comparing syndromes between each other rather than a set of typical controls. The key takeaway is that these complex conducts can be viewed as behaviours which follow various pathways with different trajectories on a continuum of developmental possibilities.
Developmental
Psychology
Typical
Atypical
Disorders
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Camilla Conroy Final Thesis copy.pdf

accesso riservato

Dimensione 490.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
490.97 kB Adobe PDF

The text of this website © Università degli studi di Padova. Full Text are published under a non-exclusive license. Metadata are under a CC0 License

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/40564